Yea but some on here want to give him all the credit like he makes Drew Brees type decisions and plays. My beef with Levi is simple. The Ohio game was perfect to show his strengths and weaknesses. Was he perfect no but I could accept that because he utilized all his abilities ran when he needed to decent passes with a couple of mistakes and that what I want to see from him every game. Stop trying to make him into something he is not a pocket passer. He is most efficient when he plays as a true duel threat QB.
To make even more simple:
In order to win a championship, we will have to beat people with our passing game. To this point, we have not shown that we can do that. Now, that’s not only on Levi. But the passing game will have to improve to hit our ceiling.
Fairly good posts. To me some of the criticism is fine for a board, but never understood why this topic got so heated. unless you know for a fact there is a replacement that is better not sure what the point of the excessive criticism was. However, with that said… when does one like Levi need to start passing the torch? how many (if any) reps should the back up get in real competitive game action, to avoid a rebuilding year so to speak? granted whether they do or not, is not up to levi. If we still had a shot at undefeated I could see holding off, but that is not the case, and I wouldnt want to risk a conference loss. But there should be some opportunities one would think.
Again, I've noted in game threads for the Nicholl's game and Ohio that our offense actually looked its best and was most efficient at the beginning of the game with a pass heavy scheme as well as early 4th quarter. When we go up tempo pass, we've been very successful.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)