Yes they are wrong about the ISU game. In context to believing ISU should have won based on and Texas should feel more at ease because......
1. If ISU didn't give up 2 special teams TD.
2. If they would have gotten a regular off-season to prepare, if the stadium wasn't empty, and if they took the game seriously.
3. If their all everything TE and lineman didn't get hurt.
4. If they wouldn't have completely quit at the end of the game and let another TD be score on them.
5. If the QB would have played better, and the team not have 3 turnovers.
How can this line of thinking make someone mostly right? Does the other team get any "Ifs" to do over and make it work out better?