ESPN preseason rankings!

[ZoomZoom]

wow, they run off black QBs and baseball players but have a black chancellor/prez. wow!

I’m surprised they have not buried/deleted the multiple threads. Not a good look at all, especially in these times of wokeness.

[R1Letterman]

from 93 season to 96 season, i,e. the jake years, i.e.e the academic class of 1997, in regular season records it was only time in school history a graduating class of cajuns had a better record than the paisley and puke whos... 25-19 vs 24-19-1
currently over the last three regular seasons we are at a dead heat of 26-8 each. time to set another school record! and if we could get an overall three game lead this season we could beat them with postseason marks included.

[billbeck451]

I have heard that the TAF is having problems, that some of the big donors have pulled out due to the woke bs from the team and from the Baton Rouge school, so their coffers may not be as deep as some would think

[Million$Mullet]

from 93 season to 96 season, i,e. the jake years, i.e.e the academic class of 1997, in regular season records it was only time in school history a graduating class of cajuns had a better record than the paisley and puke whos... 25-19 vs 24-19-1
currently over the last three regular seasons we are at a dead heat of 26-8 each. time to set another school record! and if we could get an overall three game lead this season we could beat them with postseason marks included.

Please stop

[LaCajunsFan]

They didn't get there on name recognition alone. There's quite a bit of talent returning. In fact, due to budget, resources, recent success and the fact they don't have to compete against any other instate school for the rich talent pool in Louisiana (unlike the vast majority of their SEC mates), there is absolutely no reason why LSU shouldn't be at least Top 20 preseason every year.

And let's be honest, with the above advantages both monetary and lack of instate competition, they should finish Top 10 every single season. To not is a complete waste.

This is what I have been saying for many years: if I were an lsu fan I'd be very PO'd about their ROI.

[R1Letterman]

This is what I have been saying for many years: if I were an lsu fan I'd be very PO's about their ROI.

great point. too bad the rankings couldnt factor budgets and what not in to the equation and reward those who do more with le$$

[fanof71]

from 93 season to 96 season, i,e. the jake years, i.e.e the academic class of 1997, in regular season records it was only time in school history a graduating class of cajuns had a better record than the paisley and puke whos... 25-19 vs 24-19-1
currently over the last three regular seasons we are at a dead heat of 26-8 each. time to set another school record! and if we could get an overall three game lead this season we could beat them with postseason marks included.

Think we have a 31ragin97 sighting..."noone" will confirm...

[R1Letterman]

when did prior season win-loss records become a forbidden topic?

[R1Letterman]

its almost as if some on here expect other posters to spend more time proofreading every post than the flagship spends proofreading coach’s contracts

[Million$Mullet]

when did prior season win-loss records become a forbidden topic?

Cause you’re comparing our success to lsu’s in the same time frames. You’re hoping we can surpass their win total when they have a goddamn national title in one of the same time frames. It’s ____ing idiotic to compare the two. We are paving our own path. ____ what lsu has done or is doing. Dumbass

[R1Letterman]

Cause you’re comparing our success to lsu’s in the same time frames. You’re hoping we can surpass their win total when they have a goddamn national title in one of the same time frames. It’s ____ing idiotic to compare the two. We are paving our own path. ____ what lsu has done or is doing. Dumbass

thanks for clarifying. see how easy it is to make sensible answers without attacks? stats are stats, i dont think i felt that sentiment but sorry if i implied it. seems with the national title in the mix (now that you bring it up) either makes you wonder if they really properly choose the champs and/or b. the numbers presented might lead one to question their consistency?

[CajunVic]

thanks for clarifying. see how easy it is to make sensible answers without attacks? stats are stats, i dont think i felt that sentiment but sorry if i implied it. seems with the national title in the mix (now that you bring it up) either makes you wonder if they really properly choose the champs and/or b. the numbers presented might lead one to question their consistency?

He did call you a dumbass