The problem is that the 30M a year number was introduced and instantly this thread lost creditability. I get that a great opportunity was lost, but the whole deal would sound fishy to most people after reading the first post and some that defended that number. IMO, this narrative does not serve the cause because a casual reader of this thread would quit reading after the first page.
Now, do I believe that Dr. Savoie screwed the pooch on this one? Yes! It sounds like the university has missed out on a great opportunity, but I think 30M is a big stretch. So I applaud the effort to get the word out, but I just think the cause would be better served by not exaggerating the numbers to the point of absurdity.
This is just my 2 cents worth and I am not meaning to offend anyone.
Well, the last time C4L dropped a bomb like this, people got hung up on the numbers... and it resulted in multiple reassignments, a firing of the AD (call it what you want. He was relieved of his duties), massive uproar within the community, donors walking away, a media member being suspended and months of discussions..
I wouldn’t get too blinded by the number.
It’s more of the principle of kicking the can down the road once again for the 1000x on an opportunity that could’ve moved our university and community forward.
Again, take a look at the old Lourdes property. We have been sitting on that for over ten years now, and the place is still collecting dust.
We have also had consultants who have told us our potential of getting into a bigger conference even with getting offered aid in a business model in doing so by the likes of Louisville, UCF, and TCU. Still haven’t returned their call. But that’s for another time.
It very well could and probably was, but one only knows by doing the due diligence. No where in this thread does it sound like due diligence was done by UL's leadership.
On another note, I am still hazy on the timing of this proposal. CajunT states it was a few years ago, where my reading of cajun4life is that this is very recent, especially when the thread is titled 'Here we go again'. Can anyone give the actual time frame for this, please?
Just playing devils advocate bc I’m bored...if due diligence wasn’t done on this deal, how can anyone be in a position to have all the details and determine this deal was so great and that we (T-Joe) dropped the ball on this opportunity?...is t-joe the only one who doesn't know the details that are being reported on this site?
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)