I'm certain there are some out there. The current environment with Covid-19 and colleges cutting funding across the NCAA suggest the job market is not that great right not for a move. My gut tells me once Napier is gone, he will be as well. But he can't be thrilled about Dr. Savoie delaying his extension for a year.
So have we heard any reasons as to why the university wouldn't still want to do this? Seems low risk to them while being able to generate an amount of funds for our budgets and renovations we don't have to spend money on. Were there details the developers wanted the university to commit to that exposed them in any way? Just weird.
I know it’s a drop in the bucket to most of them, but these companies spent money to cost analyze and survey the area. Counted cars, looked at foot traffic, land surveys, drawings, etc. Can’t be great business to just, ya know, NOT CALL BACK and ‘big time’ them when they reach out to us. Especially when we are paying a consultant group to put us in contact with people like this.
I bet the Alden people are thrilled about how this was handled...
Are you all saying that this group was going to pay $30MM a year to lease vacant land. I'm extremely confused.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)