Well his issue is he can't move at all so he has to settle for the 3. He cant get by anyone on the perimeter and he is undersized when he is under the rim. He can make some nifty moves with his footwork inside sometimes but for the most part, he needs someone to create for him.
He does have some limitations as you point out. However when we set plays for him to get the ball at the elbow he is fairly effective with the mid range shot. We need to do that more often for him. He also is a good free throw shooter as evidenced by him icing the game against Troy. He is more likely to get fouled on that elbow shot than he is shooting a three. I do think coaches believed he would shoot a higher three point percentage than he has. He was very effective from three while on the scout team last season. Has not translated to real games as much as was hoped.
Ummm, no good try though. The decision is not about money, at least not to a significant degree. The decision is about the administration being moderately happy with the program that Marlin runs and the "vote of confidence" that Maggard has given to many stating that the basketball program is on firm ground. People thought it was about money prior to finding out the true buyout amount.
Again, I would disagree that you are wrong in regards to gameplanning for mid range shots. Coaches run plays all the time for players to get a good look, again this is often in mid range. At the end of game, the coach wants to get the player the shot that is the most open and comfortable to them which may not be the 3.
Also, teams normally are doing what they can to run perimeter shooters off the line more and more so open 3's are less frequent these days than open mid range shots
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)