There are certainly criticisms we can make about the offensive philosophy against their 2-3 zone that resulted in getting very few "good" shots all night. We got lucky to even get the lead back when Russell got hot from the outside and shot us back in the game when we were down 8. However, I don't know how much I can criticize coach on the free throw lane violation. Most coaches work on stuff like this in practice and I would have little doubt that the players have been told you have to stay out of the lane until the ball hits the rim as the shooter. Jalen may have just gotten lost in the moment and shot the gun. You can blame coaching but its likely more on execution. Anyhow, it was a bad loss.
Wilson had two missed layups to my memory and the missed dunk by Tirus Smith on the put back hurt as well. What's not being talked about is our offensive philosophy in general. Mike, you've discussed Marlin's embracing of analytics but I still can't wrap my head around why we shoot 30 3's in a game when we barely shoot 30% as a team. For everybody out there, that is not a good percentage. In fact, it is dead last in the league but we just feel like hoisting shot after shot out there and many are from extended distance because they are not open shots. Instead of ball movement and getting more open looks in mid range we just keep banging our heads against the wall trying to do the same things that don't work very well.
Can someone explain our offense to me? I seem to not understand our goal when we have the ball.
In addition to Cedric getting hot, one reason We took lead was Johnson getting 7 quick points on mid range plays at the elbow. So there was some attempt to find different ways to attack their zone. Bad charge followed next time they went to him. Looking back at finish we should have made sure no one caught the ball in three point land after we took lead with 37 seconds remaining. Even if they get a 2 point basket or 2 free throws, we then can go for win with last shot. I believe that was defensive plan and apparently someone did not execute their defensive assignment at that time. May have been Hardy but we don’t know the rotation assignments. 75 points is enough to win. Defense was not good enough.
Regardless of whether or not a player executes no college coach should EVER throw their players under the bus by blaming them for a loss the way Marlin’s did during post-game interview.
As stated previously, this is what Hud did during the end of his tenure at UL. Smells like a coach who is desperate to me.
I don't have a problem for the most part with what he said because it was the truth and he didn't throw anybody in particular under the bus. He said they missed layups, open shots and made poor decisions when they couldn't afford to. The issue I have is the philosophy in general. We shot 30 3's for a team that is dead last in the league in 3 pt percentage. Honestly, we were lucky to shoot that because Russell obviously got real hot. If you can't adjust your philosophy to address your lack of consistent shooting, that tells me all I need to know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)