I've said it the entire time. But, let me ask you this. If money was the only reason we haven't bought him out to date, why did we spend $1.5 million buying Hud out a couple of years ago? Our athletic budget runs in the red every year and Hud's salary was similar to Napiers so how were we able to just ____ the money out then when our budgetary issues were the same?
Big donors wanted him gone and wrote checks. Also, We now have a new baseball stadium. We have added substantially to football assistant coaches salaries, probably more than tripled softball coaches salaries, way more than tripled baseball coaches salaries. This all while football and basketball attendance has dwindled. There is no more money in the money tree.
See the picture.
What list of big donors stepped up to cover the entire Hud buyout? Assuming Vic is correct about salary increases across the board, our financial standing is really no different than it was a couple of years ago. Attendance had ALREADY begun declining for several years. The baseball stadium was in the pipeline along with the financing requirements at that time. Nothing substantial has changed except for the fact that we've always seemed to come up with the money when we didn't have it. The salary increases are straight private funds. The fact is these things were prioritized at that time and committed to. The basketball coaching position is not a priority because Maggard and Savoie have been committed to Marlin. Once again, if the money was not an issue, do you feel Marlin would still be here? I do.
Which ones? What is the list of donors that wrote those checks? The same ones that we now say we don't have? The economy was no different at that time. In fact, its arguable that it was worse. Employment is up the past two years. Are you assuming these donors wrote checks or do you have proof that they did?
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)