I forgot about that one, Jay. Guess I'm getting old. lol
Also, let me correct myself. The women's final RPI in 2007 was 54 [per NCAA].
2008 was 287 [a 233 place drop in ONE year!!!]
2009 was 328
2010 to date is 302
It is safe to assume that Rogers is among the worst coaches in college basketball history.
By way of comparison, the men's RPI over the same period:
2007- 270
2008- 180
2009- 266
2010- 244
Lee's record is not stellar, either; but clearly better than Rogers.
How about
Joe Dooley
Norm Roberts
Billy G...
Kevin Keathley, was mentioned last year... Don't know if hes a possibility now
There are so many things to say but very little space and patience to say it....Well, first, your comments on Billy Kennedy completely discredit anything following them. Second, to even suggest that Jesse Evans should be brought back is a complete joke. Are you aware of what he did at San Francisco? To keep it short, he took a sebatical in the middle of the season with little reason as to why and no timeframe for which he would return given to his employer all the time while being paid...Again, in the middle of the season....Later, he was terminated because of this and San Francisco had to sue him to get their money back...The guy's a joke and there's a reason why he's not coaching. I have no problems with them letting him go to San francisco those years ago because they likely saw patterns developing that made them say no thanks. He won games but ran a program with little discipline, graduated few players and created an APR mess that Lee inherited. This program is ready to move on and like you said, they need someone to win, graduate players and keep this program's nose clean which is completely what Evans didn't do, except win of course.
You are correct on one thing. I think Robert did a poor job of recruiting local kids and keeping in touch with them. I've heard from several coaches that said they wish he had come around more to visit and take a look at kids, even if he didn't figure they'd have an opportunity at UL, keep in touch and show your face. That's what gets local coaches involved with your program and develops a level of respect. However, Evans fell off the wagon and hasn't gotten back on. You are right, we need to hire someone who will elevate the program as that is the goal on all fronts, I believe the early list of candidates has guys that all can do this. Be patient.
I agree
The very misleading phrase that has been bandied about by those that know better is. . .
"Robert cleaned up the mess after Jessie"
The statement in itself is not untrue; it just sends listeners to the wrong conclusion.
The implication is that he cleaned up Jessie's mess when the truth is he cleaned up his own mess. Robert's mess was "after Jessie” but he wasn’t cleaning up Jessie’s mess.
Joe Dooley is a coach that I wouldn't mind seeing get some consideration. I thought that he could be a candidate last year, which is when most of us thought that this job would come open.
Former HC at ECU, 57-52 in 4 seasons.
Current Head Asst under Bill Self at KU.
Ranked as one of the Top Recruiters in the country.
Was a finalist for the Holy Cross job last year.
On the outside, the biggest drawback to him would be his lack of familiarity of the area, but that could be built quickly.
He didn't have great success as a HC at ECU, but does have that experience and has tutored under one of the best coaches in the country for the past 7 years.
His credentials compare fairly well to other names thrown around. He doesn't have a 30 win season as a HC like Kennedy. He does have HC Experience, unlike Pierre, and has worked under a better coach(es). He doesn't have the number of years as a Head Coach like Kaspar, but has experience competing on a level similar to UL (as HC at ECU, and as AC at UNM and Wyoming) and at a higher level as an Assistant at KU.
I guess what I'm getting at is that few of the names thrown out there are significantly better than the others, and if they are better, it will be that much harder to convince them to choose UL over a much larger, richer program. In the second tier, each guy brings something that others don't. None of them really have the full package. But, that is why they're not in the upper tier.
Maybe you can tell us when the APR became an issue of enforcement? Evans did not have to operate his program under the APR guidelines that are apparent in the collegiate landscape today if I'm not mistaken. Therefore, he didn't necessarily have a "mess" by NCAA guidelines but Jesse clearly didn't run the program as clean as you would indicate. You also mentioned that while the APR mess was not his, he clearly had his issues. If he won consistently and didn't have APR problems, what were his "issues"?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)