Over the last several years, The Vermilion has turned into absolute garbage with absolutely no journalistic integrity by writers and editors.
Check out this article: https://www.thevermilion.com/news/ul.6a678d19f.html
Here are several excerpts (in italics) from the article:
"According to anonymous sources, the University of Louisiana atLafayette has a secret committee for its new school mascot. The student, who wished to remain anonymous, said he overheard from someone that the university was searching for a new mascot and the all of the members on committee signed NDAs."
The article is based off of an anonymous source who overheard someone else (also anonymous). What type of editor would allow an article be published based off of hearsay from an anonymous source? Later in the article, a second anonymous source is quoted:
"Another student who wished to remain anonymous said she heard about the secret committee from Amy Windsor, social media strategist for UL Lafayette."
.and last but not least, a quote from an anonymous source who can't remember where she heard something:
The anonymous student did say three ideas for the new mascot were mentioned with the committee: "I can't remember where I heard this but the top-three they were considering were a bulldog, a pelican and a gator," she said.
So apparently at The Vermilion you can write whatever you want and quote multiple anonymous sources to back your claims.