Her original intent (taking liberties here) 'Some (3) didn't have fun' is no big deal. Extrapolating it into some bigger picture is where she went tangent. Common media tactic these days; making more of a situation than what it is.
Jonathan Stove was right (taking liberties here) 'Fun is what YOU make it.'
The guy who goes to the dance and stands in a corner, asks no one to dance and doesn't interreact is correct. 'HE didn't have fun.'
The wall could be right next to the dance floor (tailgating right next to the field) it is up to each individual to make the best of any situation.
jmo
Look very closely and you will find her following on Social Media is mostly her friends, which hardly represents any diverse group of opinions. She had a right to write the article but it is factually inaccurate. She does not have a right to her own truth. That my problem.
So....
I take it Miss Smith is not interested in an open dialogue about her issues with the admin's decision or her dissatisfaction with student tailgating?
SHOCKED.
You want interactive? Try putting the phone down and interacting. Tailgate with friends. Join one of the many groups engaged in game-day activity. Cheer for your team. Heckle the opposing team. Make a sign for TV exposure. Dress in costume. There are infinite ways to be interactive at a football game. The students 50 miles east don’t have this problem. Their problem is admission. Not free and not abundantly available.
Alternatively, you can do what I did: park cars before the game for money, and clean the stadium after for philanthropy. In between, I was in the stands. FREE FOOTBALL, PEOPLE. I was too poor to not take advantage of free entertainment options.
Also, the pre game music on the alumni side necessarily incorporates our unique culture and is part of the brand in a way. The in-game music is ALL about the students. I guess they would have to attend to realize that.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)