This doesn't tell me a whole lot. I didn't see a whole lot of guys open out there, certainly not where he missed them with bad throws. There was the deep ball to Bradley that he overthrew early but Bradley was double teamed and you do miss those from time to time, especially if the DB's affect the receivers route running and timing.
“Doomsday” 🙄
Its intellectually dishonest to watch this team play and say we’re better than average at QB.
Between the two games played, we’ve left 30+ points on the field, turned the ball over 5-6 times and can’t hit the homerun ball when receivers are open by 10 yards. You can not win consistently, especially against teams like Ohio, App St and Troy with these issues.
I'm actually kind of surprised by some and how much they still bash him. I'm not a LL loyalist but it sounds that way because I continuously find myself defending him especially when its still unclear as to how much talent we truly have at the WR position. We are playing a number of freshmen and I never thought we'd need to do that and Bradley is our only proven commodity at this point.
I get that he's not going to be the best passer we've had here but I'm surprised as to how many people don't give him any credit for the positive plays and drives he does make.
I don’t see much “bashing”. I see people asking legitimate questions, for the most part.
I assume, people give him little credit because of the system, and how Napier has proven to set players up for success. Nunez was a great example of taking someone with limited ability and getting the most out of them.
People expect a certain level of success with this coaching staff. Fair or not, that’s going to work against any QB.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)