If you think playing .600 baseball at the college level is good then you need to find another job. Sorry to break that news to you. I mean really ? 35-21 is good ? That's a prime example of what I've said many times on this board. Mediocrity is totally cool over here. Very much accepted. And that's exactly why we are where we're at.
I'd say it's good, not great. I don't think it is up to anyone's standards. I think the goal every year is to win 40. Realistically, we will not win 40 games every year. It doesn't matter who the coach is.
No one is okay with mediocrity. The difference in opinion on our forum seems to be to me that there are those that believe Robe is our best realistic option to meet our goals and those that do not believe Robe is the best realistic option.
I'm sure Duckman, you, and some others may feel I am a moron, but I still believe in Robe. This season is definitely testing my belief being that in my opinion it is worse than mediocre, but I still believe Robe is our best realistic option.
That ring wasn’t a SBC teams. Now if they win one this year you can drag out that text again. Weren’t they in their exiting year of the Big South? Regardless some other league.
You'll have to show me where I said it was.
The SEC touted any, and every, credential available when inviting Missouri, Arkansas and Texas A&M to be members. They went as far as saying their membership would improve competition.
Why would anyone claim the Sun Belt wasn't more competitive with the reigning national champion joining the conference?
35/21 is a season no program should be satisfied with unless their schedule justifies an at large bid. Teams in the G5 will always need to get to 40 plus wins to have a chance for an at large.
If the university you support goals are to have a nice program that only hopes to occasionally win a conference tournament for a 4 seed that’s sad.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)