BB Final: LA 5, App St 6

[Dad04]

Pretty sure flood insurance in a flood zone is required with a mortgage.

[CajunT]

Pretty sure flood insurance in a flood zone is required with a mortgage.

It is, unless your home is paid off which was the case for a number of people.

[CajunAmos]

Do they get playing time if Kasuls (senior), Lahare (senior), and Gavin (senior) are healthy?

I think in Lahare and Gavin's place, yes, as they weren't hitting.

[CajunEXPRESS]

Express, why didn't you buy it? I can tell you where I built my house 26 years ago flood insurance wasn't needed. In fact my home was never in a flood zone and it wasn't needed. But why purchase it when your home hasn't flooded to your front door, because you should insure for a 500 yr flood?

Now after those floods, some of my neighbors homes flooded down my street, something that has never happened in 26 years living in this neighborhood. So now I have flood insurance even though my street and neighborhood is still not considered in a flood zone according to the new maps released.

People can insure their homes and auto's with higher coverage spending hundreds if not thousands of dollars waiting for a 500 yr weather event or the worst case scenario with an auto accident. There are sensible and reasonable coverages available for people that don't live in flood zones or need million dollars in liability coverage for their auto's.

Now anyone that lives in a flood zone and doesn't purchase the proper coverage, they have gambled with their homes and families.

I'm sorry that my post wasn't clear. I absolutely bought the flood policy, a few years later I sold the property. I don't know if they bought it. Bab should have had the insurance was the point then he could focus on his job.

[CajunRage]

It is, unless your home is paid off which was the case for a number of people.

We aren’t here to debate people’s personal decisions. This issue here is that tony and bab had personal issues that affected their ability to carry out their employment responsibilities. Regardless of what, they should have blocked it out and done their job or stepped away.

[LifeTimeCajun]

with ALLL the injuries we have it will force us to “develop” the young freshman both pitchers and hitters. They have a half season to get dirt under cleats

[barisaxman]

Was a little surprised this morning that both Stevie and Foote took the team to task over their performance this past weekend. Both called it a BAD series loss—Foote compared them to a “hacker” golfer—can’t get all phases of their game to work at the same time—said they just can’t get out of their own way!! Waiting for Topham and Jay—thinking it’ll be fullscale damage control....

[CajunT]

We aren’t here to debate people’s personal decisions. This issue here is that tony and bab had personal issues that affected their ability to carry out their employment responsibilities. Regardless of what, they should have blocked it out and done their job or stepped away.

I'm questioning someone's statement, you don't like it step out!

[CajunT]

I'm sorry that my post wasn't clear. I absolutely bought the flood policy, a few years later I sold the property. I don't know if they bought it. Bab should have had the insurance was the point then he could focus on his job.

Well considering hindsight, yes he may have made that decision. My point to you is if he was not in a flood zone and there was no history of his property being under water, why would he had purchased it? For a 500 yr flood? I guess from an insurance side, it looks different than that of a consumer.

[CajunRage]

I'm questioning someone's statement, you don't like it step out!

Cool down T. Just didn't want the thread to turn into a flood insurance conversation.

[CajunEXPRESS]

Risk/reward T. I’ll put it like this.

Say there’s a ping pong air machine with 99 white balls and one red. The game master comes to me and says ten thousand buys you chance at the hundred million dollar red ball. I’m jumping on that all day. My risk ten grand. Same game master tells me if I get a white ball a bunch of hungry lions are released with me in the room. I’m not getting into that risk/reward a hundred million or being torn apart.

Besides not believing in 500 year odds. The risk of losing everything instead of losing a few hundred. I went with the low cost no risk. That’s the only way I can explain it. On the other hand I never ever buy extended warranty because the reward/risk don’t matter much, I’m very likely to win the risk vs the cost of rewards.

[Dad04]

Well considering hindsight, yes he may have made that decision. My point to you is if he was not in a flood zone and there was no history of his property being under water, why would he had purchased it? For a 500 yr flood? I guess from an insurance side, it looks different than that of a consumer.

His house is in a FEMA flood zone. It got flooded like thousands of others the same day.

Bab did the Monday presser today, not Robe.