Fair enough. He is already successful, but needs more performances like last week to be considered one of the best. I have a feeling this will never be dropped because a lot of “expert” talent evaluators on this site said he is not good enough to move us forward. I strongly suspect when he has a poor game (and he will have at least one over the next year and a half), a bunch of people here will crawl out of the woodwork to say he needs to be replaced. It is what it is, but I for one am enjoying this season and this team.
I just hope he plays out his eligibility. He had originally said he would not be here for his senior year, but that was under Hud. Maybe he will stay since the prospects are even encouraging for doing something special next season.
I think you’re overselling what the naysayers are saying. We’ve had teams where the quarterback is what the other teams have to contain. Babb, Mitchell, Delhomme, Desormeaux, Henry are some of the best. Not many. Then there was a healthy Broadway, and again we’re a quarterback led team. I think it’s fair to say Levi isn’t that player. He’s doing a good job of playing to his strengths. Still if I’m the defense I’m saying prove you can beat me, I’m containing the run, containing the jet sweeps. I’ll go one on one deep.
This Levi discussion has become stupid because people make it stupid. And these extreme terms that people use to describe him and his ability conflate the problem.
He's a good QB, in a great system (that usually highlights his strengths), on one of the best football teams we've ever had. In certain situations, he is limited. When the plan doesn't work, the limitations are more obvious than the times when the plan does work. He has definitely played a role in this year's success.
The kid is coming off of his best game as D1 QB. As I said on the podcast, I think his ceiling is still high. I know Billy & Co will get the best out of him. How good that can be is yet to be seen.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)