Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired lochridge was even worse last year at hitting though windham hit .170 and lochridge hit .120 why are you ok with lochridge but not windham who is wayyy better in the field? Probably because Loch has already gotten a 2 hits and 3 good ABs. ???
Originally Posted by ManAboutTown Probably because Loch has already gotten a 2 hits and 3 good ABs. ??? ok so he can improve from one season to next but not windham??? ok got you
Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired ok so he can improve from one season to next but not windham??? ok got you Maybe one looked a lot better in fall and spring too
Originally Posted by wcd35 Maybe one looked a lot better in fall and spring too Thank you. I told them that already but people don’t pay attention.
Originally Posted by wcd35 Maybe one looked a lot better in fall and spring too i am not arguing that just arguing mat's logic
Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired i am not arguing that just arguing mat's logic My logic is what I told y’all last week. Loch has been healthy and really flourishing under Wells. That’s why he’s starting.
Originally Posted by ManAboutTown My logic is what I told y’all last week. Loch has been healthy and really flourishing under Wells. That’s why he’s starting. that's fine but dont reference last year's stats when lochridge actually looked worse at the plate
anybody elses feed keep loading? its seriously ____ing me off
Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired anybody elses feed keep loading? its seriously ____ing me off It ____ed me off so bad I said screw it and came to the park
Originally Posted by RC8 It ____ed me off so bad I said screw it and came to the park just making sure its not just me
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Forum Rules