Page 11 of 23 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 21 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 227

Thread: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

  1. Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    Quote Originally Posted by CharlieK View Post
    No doubt, but you should ALWAYS control the things you have control over. Payton didn't do that. He can't control the refs but he can control his clock management, and it was terrible on that series.
    A completion (without the interference) would have done exactly what you suggested.

  2. #102

    Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    Maybe this was posted: The last 13 words sure come into play in this game.


    The Commissioner has the sole authority to investigate and take appropriate disciplinary and/or corrective measures if any club action, non-participant interference, or calamity occurs in an NFL game which the Commissioner deems so extraordinarily unfair or outside the accepted tactics encountered in professional football that such action has a major effect on the result of the game.



    It was noted the provision falls under Rule 17, Section 2, Article 1. However, many believe it is unlikely that Goodell would use it.


  3. Default Re: Michael Thomas cites NFL rulebook on "extraordinarily unfair acts"

    Quote Originally Posted by NewsCopy View Post
    Thomas cited Rule 17, Section 2 ("Extraordinarily unfair acts"), Article 3 of the NFL rulebook, which states. "The Commissioner's powers under this Section 2 include the imposition of monetary fines and draft-choice forfeitures, suspension of persons involved in unfair acts, and, if appropriate, the reversal of a game's result or the rescheduling of a game, either from the beginning or from the point at which the extraordinary act occurred."

    Saints ought to file suit, ask for a preliminary injunction and demand that the game be replayed from that play forward with the appropriate penalty enforced.

    Edit: they could do that this coming weekend right before the Pro Bowl.

  4. #104

    Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    If this was to be enacted and resume play with less than two minute, the west coast would fall into the ocean with the level of the water rising because of all the tears.


  5. #105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    So you going to fine this guy $500? In the zero's game, that would be the commensurate fine to those levied against players.
    Where did i say $500? Hold his pay for that game which is roughly around $10k. Demotion, fines, not eligible for post season will cost them a lot of money....but you are right, much better to do nothing. This was egregious, not even a questionable call. This was either you are totally incompetent or you are on the take type of missed call. At worst you throw the flag and discuss, if all agree it wasn’t PI they pick up the flag like they do all the time. This wasn’t hand checking..he crushed the guy. Even if Lewis catches it, there should have been a flag for helmet to helmet.

  6. #106

    Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    Quote Originally Posted by CharlieK View Post
    Absolutely terrible no-call and people should be fired. There is not even a kind of legitimate argument against that.

    But if Payton just runs the ball three times, and forces the Rams to use their timeouts then kicks the field goal, they would have had a much much much better chance to overcome the epically bad no call (x2, don't forget the helmet to helmet on the same play). That was some ____ poor time management by a guy who should know better.
    A run was called on first down after the Ginn reception at the 2 minute warning. Brees checked out of it.

  7. Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Where did i say $500? Hold his pay for that game which is roughly around $10k. Demotion, fines, not eligible for post season will cost them a lot of money....but you are right, much better to do nothing. This was egregious, not even a questionable call. This was either you are totally incompetent or you are on the take type of missed call. At worst you throw the flag and discuss, if all agree it wasn’t PI they pick up the flag like they do all the time. This wasn’t hand checking..he crushed the guy. Even if Lewis catches it, there should have been a flag for helmet to helmet.
    He was not going to make a game changing call at that point, period. He was not quick enough mentally to realize that the decision he made was a game changing "no call."

  8. Default Re: Michael Thomas cites NFL rulebook on "extraordinarily unfair acts"

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    Saints ought to file suit, ask for a preliminary injunction and demand that the game be replayed from that play forward with the appropriate penalty enforced.

    Edit: they could do that this coming weekend right before the Pro Bowl.
    .........what about the bouncing ball close to the punt returner that looked like it hit him and was taken in for a TD......with no replay this probably wins it for KC..... but the play was over ruled and Pats got possession .....the screen don’t lie no!

  9. #109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    He was not going to make a game changing call at that point, period. He was not quick enough mentally to realize that the decision he made was a game changing "no call."
    So there are no rules at the end? The defender made the game changing the mistake, it’s the officials job to call it regardless of when it happens. He f’n tackled the guy. Sent him flying in the air. It wasn’t 3 fingers on a jersey

  10. #110

    Default Re: NFC Champioship Decided by Inept Referees

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    A completion (without the interference) would have done exactly what you suggested.
    My GOD......I UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THE NON CALL WAS TERRIBLE AND GAME CHANGING.

Page 11 of 23 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 21 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •