It is true but the rebounding differential is always an effort deal. We could have crashed the offensive glass like they did and possibly could have gotten better open opportunities from the outside at the least. Its been a trend at other times this year. When you are too reliant upon 3 point shooting and you are not making them, you have to do things differently.
When they out-rebound you by 20 (46-26) with 16 on offense (to our 7) and are outscored by 15 from three pointers (AST 10-25 Cajuns 5-24) even turning them over 22 times to our 11 you can't overcome that large a disparity. I've heard some says we don't have rebounders, and I'll agree height can play a big part of that, but most NCAA teams these days are working with players from 6'5" to 6'9", and I was always taught that rebounding (like defense) was a technique and effort skill that can be taught.
Lucy, we got some learning to do, and have for quite a while (without Bryce & Shawn in the mix).
Well the better coaches recruit better. Having recruited better means they also recruit for injuries as well as planned departures. I’m sure Bob will never admit he’s had to take some drop down players. Additionally every single coach misses on some players. You’ve got to admit it and find a better fit for those young players so that you can replace them.
The issue is that we always hear how great our recruiting classes are. Yet, we never have depth. Imagine that.
bump. thread TITLE was changed by someone.
And notice how my post above yours still stays accurate
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)