Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 13 to 18 of 18

Thread: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

  1. Default Re: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunfanatico View Post
    How the Cajuns have thrived with a two-QB rotation in Levi Lewis, Andre Nunez

    https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana...19e5defdd.html
    ......So we have national media calling us by the name we officially call ourselves, but we still have a semi local BR paper determined to choose a name that we despise.....what if we banned the Morn Ad from our press conferences for their derogatory use of our brand....could be a great move, stir the stuff, or be a terrible blunder.....boy does it ______ us all off....also why let Dan continue as a UL major announcer to write with the hated word usage for this paper....I fully understand that Dan has to have the not wanted identification, but where does loyalty show its face?

  2. #14

    Default Re: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    ......So we have national media calling us by the name we officially call ourselves, but we still have a semi local BR paper determined to choose a name that we despise.....what if we banned the Morn Ad from our press conferences for their derogatory use of our brand....could be a great move, stir the stuff, or be a terrible blunder.....boy does it ______ us all off....also why let Dan continue as a UL major announcer to write with the hated word usage for this paper....I fully understand that Dan has to have the not wanted identification, but where does loyalty show its face?
    I'd love for Dan to tell those editors that he'll refuse to continue to write articles for them if they don't go by our preferred branding, but they'd just say, "ok", and he knows that.

  3. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun_lannister View Post
    I don't think it worked too well it lead to a good amount of miscues ... there is a reason why its not common place in football
    I agree! I hope we NEVER see this again! We are going to a bowl game in spite of us running a two QB system, NOT because of it. I agree with others that I am hoping our QB for next season is not on campus yet.

  4. #16

    Default Re: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

    +1, Note to Napier: Please don't ever run the 2-QB again. Thanks.


  5. #17

    Default Re: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

    Leave Dan alone Boomer


  6. #18

    Default Re: Napier had a reason for sticking with UL 2-QB plan

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun_lannister View Post
    I don't think it worked too well it lead to a good amount of miscues ... there is a reason why its not common place in football
    At one time, that was said about passing the football also.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Napier has a plan for long layoff until UL bowl game
    By NewsCopy in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: December 24th, 2019, 11:24 am
  2. LA offensive line is all about sticking together
    By NewsCopy in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 13th, 2018, 08:42 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 3rd, 2018, 03:50 pm
  4. Napier has a QB plan for Mississippi State
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 14th, 2018, 06:30 pm
  5. BMW Sticking With Diesel Gameplan
    By NewsCopy in forum All Cars Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 21st, 2015, 06:58 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •