
Originally Posted by
FacelessBuffoon
Vic I am just saying you use words like trash or bash when some one gives an opinion. No one on here has ever trashed Chandler fields. Metry, Krazy and Myself just said we all saw Fields on a few occasions and we all have questions, and the same opinion on if we think he will be the future here. It doesn't mean we have I'll will toward him or want him to fail. I wish nothing but the best for the kid.
I have a daughter on the TC Rebel Review dance team. I am pretty sure Krazy has a son that plays football, and a pretty good one at that, if he is who I think he is. TC receivers are white with average speed and dropped about 50% of the passes that hit them in both hands. The ones that were completed down field, the little QB had to thread the needle because of no separation. That is just a fact. Not trashing or bashing just stating what was obvious if you watched them all year. I think coach Dane would agree. If you watch STM on the other hand with a very above average, very well coached receiver corp, their QB throws to wide open kids with no one around them all the time. Hell my 6'3" 320lb washed up ex athelete @$$ could complete those. Just because krazy me or anyone else says we'd like to see him work in tighter coverage situations doesn't mean we think he's not good. We just want to see the accuracy when he's got to put it in a tight spot. Not sure if you know this, but coming from STM dads after last year, accuracy was his biggest question mark. I would love to see the kid here I think Billy could fix his deficiencies. But he aint coming from what I ve been told.
IMO it appears when some gives an opinion based on what they saw you want to argue and say they are bashing the kid or Napier's recruiting ability..... When it is obviously not the case.
How many times this year have you seen those 3 teams in question in order to say any of those statements are inaccurate?