Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 34

Thread: Relish the Execution

  1. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fanof71 View Post
    Anywhere we can watch a replay of game?
    ESPN+

  2. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MetryCajun View Post
    Agreed. It seems by just blind luck we could have 3 or 4 studs on defense. If you watch the defense you see they are mixing up calls and blitzing from different angles. The players just are not fast enough. To me Middleton and McDowell look like they have the speed to play their positions. I'm sure there are others, but those are the two that caught my eye.
    When McCaskill and Hill get back to 100 percent the defense will be improved. They may need Manac back as well to be an effective group. Need for all those guys points to lack of depth. However Basin Bear is encouraged by the incremental progress he sees many of the young guys making.

  3. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MetryCajun View Post
    Agreed. It seems by just blind luck we could have 3 or 4 studs on defense. If you watch the defense you see they are mixing up calls and blitzing from different angles. The players just are not fast enough. To me Middleton and McDowell look like they have the speed to play their positions. I'm sure there are others, but those are the two that caught my eye.
    There are more.....some are very young and until the scheme is natural to them they will be a step slow in reaction time.....some others are just not good enough

  4. #16

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    We are improving week to week.. Naps and co. are slowly changing things around. Cant wait until they have better players to work with. Having 7 scholly players who used to be walk ons is never a good sign. Time will heal.


  5. #17

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    It's hard for me to rationalize the disparity in our offense and our defense. In consecutive years of recruiting slumps, I would think the offense would take a greater hit than the defense.
    In a re recruiting slump, defence will almost always suffer more than offense. This is because on offense, even a blown play can succeed if the guy with the ball is good enough, and even a bad play usually results in the loss of only a few yards. Great defence requires every player to do his job on every play, and one mistake can cost a touchdown.

  6. #18

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    In a re recruiting slump, defence will almost always suffer more than offense. This is because on offense, even a blown play can succeed if the guy with the ball is good enough, and even a bad play usually results in the loss of only a few yards. Great defence requires every player to do his job on every play, and one mistake can cost a touchdown.
    Beyond the recruiting slump, we also had limited scholarships. Coach Napier told the QB Club it will take a couple more years before he has the roster at the no. of players he wants and just as importantly at the quality he likes. Defense may struggle for another year due to the points made by the VObserver. It can't happen any faster these days because of the new rules preventing over signing. It the old days you could sign 35 players and run off 10 to get to 25. You can't run off guys anymore without cause. In fact, he said there are currently some of the guys playing as walkons that he would like to give scholarships to even if it meant yanking some from guys currently on scholarship. He can't do that due to the current rules. Obviously no names were given.

  7. #19

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunsmike View Post
    Beyond the recruiting slump, we also had limited scholarships. Coach Napier told the QB Club it will take a couple more years before he has the roster at the no. of players he wants and just as importantly at the quality he likes. Defense may struggle for another year due to the points made by the VObserver. It can't happen any faster these days because of the new rules preventing over signing. It the old days you could sign 35 players and run off 10 to get to 25. You can't run off guys anymore without cause. In fact, he said there are currently some of the guys playing as walkons that he would like to give scholarships to even if it meant yanking some from guys currently on scholarship. He can't do that due to the current rules. Obviously no names were given.
    The last two sentences sums up our situation best. We have some scholly hold overs that are not winners and are negative baggage. But yet we are stuck with them. I'm guessing some of the questionable character guys that Hud took a chance on.

  8. #20

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by angeleast View Post
    The last two sentences sums up our situation best. We have some scholly hold overs that are not winners and are negative baggage. But yet we are stuck with them. I'm guessing some of the questionable character guys that Hud took a chance on.
    Some guys were let go at the end of summer. Obviously that happened with cause, most likely academics. I don't think we have many character issues to deal with. Players who he feels may have walkons deserving of their scholarship are likely simply lacking talent needed to reach the goals he has for the program.

  9. #21

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Somebody from the press asked John McKay the coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at the time what were his thoughts were on the execution of the offensive line. He said "he thought it was a good idea". It's all a matter of perspective.


  10. #22

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by basinbear View Post
    There are more.....some are very young and until the scheme is natural to them they will be a step slow in reaction time.....some others are just not good enough
    Who are the other guys you think have the ability to play at this level? I see Garror being a tough/undersized player and possibly Hill on the DL.

  11. UL Football Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by MetryCajun View Post
    Obviously the offensive execution was excellent and was fun to watch. I really liked how UL spread the ball around and mixed up the run and pass. That said, those were two of the worst defenses I have ever seen. There is no reason to ever punt against either team. If you cannot get 10yards in four plays you are calling the wrong plays. I have no idea how many more games we can win with a defense this bad. Our offense could conceivably control the clock and limit possessions, but against better teams how will we stop them? The stats may not bear it out at the end of the season, but I think this is one of the 3 worst defenses we have had over the past 30 years...and that is saying something.
    To beat App St or Ark St I think we have to score in the upper 40's to win.
    To beat anyone we'll have to score in the upper forties. If we're not scoring the other is very likely to be scoring.

    In refute of your argument several teams needed to punt more than twice vs NMSU. But in support of your argument CCU ignored the punt on a couple of punting situations, so there's that as well.

  12. #24

    Default Re: Relish the Execution

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS View Post
    To beat anyone we'll have to score in the upper forties. If we're not scoring the other is very likely to be scoring.

    In refute of your argument several teams needed to punt more than twice vs NMSU. But in support of your argument CCU ignored the punt on a couple of punting situations, so there's that as well.
    You may be on to something with the need for the offense to be effective every game. Coach Napier blamed the CC loss on the slow start by the offense which left the defense have the play count go against them late in the game.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hudspeth happy with Cajuns' execution
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 3rd, 2012, 01:06 pm
  2. Scheme, Execution or Confidence
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 27th, 2009, 04:26 am
  3. Goals, Plans, Execution?
    By Cajun Express in forum Football
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 9th, 2006, 06:20 pm
  4. Execution should be key factor in Classic
    By NewsCopy in forum Basketball
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 30th, 2003, 05:37 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •