When McCaskill and Hill get back to 100 percent the defense will be improved. They may need Manac back as well to be an effective group. Need for all those guys points to lack of depth. However Basin Bear is encouraged by the incremental progress he sees many of the young guys making.
We are improving week to week.. Naps and co. are slowly changing things around. Cant wait until they have better players to work with. Having 7 scholly players who used to be walk ons is never a good sign. Time will heal.
In a re recruiting slump, defence will almost always suffer more than offense. This is because on offense, even a blown play can succeed if the guy with the ball is good enough, and even a bad play usually results in the loss of only a few yards. Great defence requires every player to do his job on every play, and one mistake can cost a touchdown.
Beyond the recruiting slump, we also had limited scholarships. Coach Napier told the QB Club it will take a couple more years before he has the roster at the no. of players he wants and just as importantly at the quality he likes. Defense may struggle for another year due to the points made by the VObserver. It can't happen any faster these days because of the new rules preventing over signing. It the old days you could sign 35 players and run off 10 to get to 25. You can't run off guys anymore without cause. In fact, he said there are currently some of the guys playing as walkons that he would like to give scholarships to even if it meant yanking some from guys currently on scholarship. He can't do that due to the current rules. Obviously no names were given.
Some guys were let go at the end of summer. Obviously that happened with cause, most likely academics. I don't think we have many character issues to deal with. Players who he feels may have walkons deserving of their scholarship are likely simply lacking talent needed to reach the goals he has for the program.
Somebody from the press asked John McKay the coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at the time what were his thoughts were on the execution of the offensive line. He said "he thought it was a good idea". It's all a matter of perspective.
To beat anyone we'll have to score in the upper forties. If we're not scoring the other is very likely to be scoring.
In refute of your argument several teams needed to punt more than twice vs NMSU. But in support of your argument CCU ignored the punt on a couple of punting situations, so there's that as well.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)