For about a year, I used to live a quarter-mile from UCLA stadium - it is nothing special - certainly does not have the charm of Lamson and the crowds were never loud. Not surprisingly, when I went to see a game there and told their knowledgeable fans I was an ardent fan of the Cajun team, they were Very complimentary of our program.
Case dismissed these young ladies appear to be overnourished.
DJ just proved that she's not as intelligent as we gave her credit. If she thinks using the Nike Palace as an example of normal athlete perks, she's going to get her lunch eaten in court. When UL softball is compared to schools of similar budgets, I'd like to know where we stand on gender equity. I'd also like to know if the UL softball players think their winning percentage (versus men's sports) is the litmus test for equity. Do UL women athletes who aren't as good as the Cajuns softball women deserve less?
I'd really like to know if our softball women had it better, same or worse than other schools in the SBC and/or similarly budgeted schools. I was always convinced that the biggest athletic equity was educational opportunity. It seems to have morphed over the years to things I'm not sure the public knows about. The public, in all actuality, isn't getting more fond of public university athletics. Paying to pamper students, much less athletes, wasn't the mission when taxation for education opportunity was 99.9% of the deal.
Did we not allow our softball players to go to class?
If Lamson did not have tap water (unless Lafayette has provably dirty water) in the dressing room to fill a water jug, there may be a case. Pretty sure, an ice machine could have been made available or a manager could have made the 50-yard walk to the APC. If bottled water, preferably Fiji or Evian water, was not available, this should be made a Federal case - oops, already has been.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)