Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53

Thread: Former UL Softball players release talking points

  1. #31

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Quote Originally Posted by Bankruptcyman View Post
    How many G5 schools not located in California routinely play in the Garman Classic? Although UL clearly and passionately support softball, the sport still does not make a profit. Yet they play games and tournaments all over the U.S. UL did not have to allow that. These female programs exist because of what happened this weekend . . . the football team prostitutes itself for $1.25 million in order to support the other athletic programs. I am sorry that (perhaps) the football team got a few extra cookies at training table. This softball team was treated very well and had world class facilities. And to the girl that transferred to Michigan State, the females in that athletic program were abused by Larry Nasser. I don't think comparing how female athletes at Michigan State are treated to how they are treated at UL is going to be a favorable one. This entitlement mentality is just senseless and nauseating.
    We only started playing in the Garman Classic again recently. We were not on their schedule for many years...because Lotief ____ed them off so badly because he _____ed about everything.

  2. #32

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun_lannister View Post



    That is UCLA's softball stadium you know one of the most storied programs in softball history
    For about a year, I used to live a quarter-mile from UCLA stadium - it is nothing special - certainly does not have the charm of Lamson and the crowds were never loud. Not surprisingly, when I went to see a game there and told their knowledgeable fans I was an ardent fan of the Cajun team, they were Very complimentary of our program.

  3. #33

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Case dismissed these young ladies appear to be overnourished.


  4. #34
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    DJ just proved that she's not as intelligent as we gave her credit. If she thinks using the Nike Palace as an example of normal athlete perks, she's going to get her lunch eaten in court. When UL softball is compared to schools of similar budgets, I'd like to know where we stand on gender equity. I'd also like to know if the UL softball players think their winning percentage (versus men's sports) is the litmus test for equity. Do UL women athletes who aren't as good as the Cajuns softball women deserve less?

    I'd really like to know if our softball women had it better, same or worse than other schools in the SBC and/or similarly budgeted schools. I was always convinced that the biggest athletic equity was educational opportunity. It seems to have morphed over the years to things I'm not sure the public knows about. The public, in all actuality, isn't getting more fond of public university athletics. Paying to pamper students, much less athletes, wasn't the mission when taxation for education opportunity was 99.9% of the deal.

    Did we not allow our softball players to go to class?


  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    DJ just proved that she's not as intelligent as we gave her credit. If she thinks using the Nike Palace as an example of normal athlete perks, she's going to get her lunch eaten in court. When UL softball is compared to schools of similar budgets, I'd like to know where we stand on gender equity. I'd also like to know if the UL softball players think their winning percentage (versus men's sports) is the litmus test for equity. Do UL women athletes who aren't as good as the Cajuns softball women deserve less?

    I'd really like to know if our softball women had it better, same or worse than other schools in the SBC and/or similarly budgeted schools. I was always convinced that the biggest athletic equity was educational opportunity. It seems to have morphed over the years to things I'm not sure the public knows about. The public, in all actuality, isn't getting more fond of public university athletics. Paying to pamper students, much less athletes, wasn't the mission when taxation for education opportunity was 99.9% of the deal.

    Did we not allow our softball players to go to class?
    I don't think so, but they definitely didn't have access to clean water.

    Or so I've heard.

  6. #36

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Quote Originally Posted by DieHard1280 View Post
    I don't think so, but they definitely didn't have access to clean water.

    Or so I've heard.
    If Lamson did not have tap water (unless Lafayette has provably dirty water) in the dressing room to fill a water jug, there may be a case. Pretty sure, an ice machine could have been made available or a manager could have made the 50-yard walk to the APC. If bottled water, preferably Fiji or Evian water, was not available, this should be made a Federal case - oops, already has been.

  7. #37

    Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Quote Originally Posted by UncleCajun View Post
    If Lamson did not have tap water (unless Lafayette has provably dirty water) in the dressing room to fill a water jug, there may be a case. Pretty sure, an ice machine could have been made available or a manager could have made the 50-yard walk to the APC. If bottled water, preferably Fiji or Evian water, was not available, this should be made a Federal case - oops, already has been.
    Be sure not to drink out of the water fountains behind the stands - must be the dirty water D.J. is talking about. (Sarcasm off)

  8. Default Re: Former UL Softball players release talking points

    Quote Originally Posted by UncleCajun View Post
    If Lamson did not have tap water (unless Lafayette has provably dirty water) in the dressing room to fill a water jug, there may be a case. Pretty sure, an ice machine could have been made available or a manager could have made the 50-yard walk to the APC. If bottled water, preferably Fiji or Evian water, was not available, this should be made a Federal case - oops, already has been.
    You would think we could have gotten a split to extend the baseball Water Hose all the way to Lamson. $100 fix and the boys and girls could all be equal.

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    You would think we could have gotten a split to extend the baseball Water Hose all the way to Lamson. $100 fix and the boys and girls could all be equal.
    I’m thinking the boys cut off the hose recently and went to Evian or Fiji water. Hence the reason the girls are mad.

  10. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DieHard1280 View Post
    I don't think so, but they definitely didn't have access to clean water.

    Or so I've heard.
    Hell, I drank the water out the faucet of the track & field bathroom...before the renovation. Anyone who went in that restroom pre-2011 knows it was nothing pretty.

    And I ended up ok, no??

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Plenty of talking points for Stroman
    By NewsCopy in forum Basketball
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 23rd, 2019, 05:50 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •