Lots and lots of damn good talent on paper sitting on the bench and waiting their turn to play when the game starts. Many of those are who played the second half.
Agree on the RB duo. In fact we have three good RB. It's a shame we do not have a talented QB, because we could really keep teams off balance with our solid WR.
QB situation is a the end result of athlete worship. Hud and Les both suffered from this. When your RBs are as good as they have been at both schools, you need a QB, not an athlete...unless your running an option offense.
QB situation is a the end result of athlete worship. Hud and Les both suffered from this. When your RBs are as good as they have been at both schools, you need a QB, not an athlete...unless your running an option offense.
Couldn’t agree more. Too bad Ray cannot at the Des level. We could really control the ball with a QB like that.
No, and nobody's scout team or third stringers are full of 5 and 4 stars.
We are not "full" of 5's, 4's or 3's on our starting team and I would venture to say accross the board that Bama's scout team has more 5's than we start, more 4's than we start, more 3's than we start, less 2's than we start and less walk'ons than we start.
We are not "full" of 5's, 4's or 3's on our starting team and I would venture to say accross the board that Bama's scout team has more 5's than we start, more 4's than we start, more 3's than we start, less 2's than we start and less walk'ons than we start.
How about I try it this way. In the second half, at all times, I would venture to say that Bama still had more 5's 4's and 3's on the field playing that UL did and that UL probability had more 2's and walkons playing than Bama did. Does that help?
How about I try it this way. In the second half, at all times, I would venture to say that Bama still had more 5's 4's and 3's on the field playing that UL did and that UL probability had more 2's and walkons playing than Bama did. Does that help?
And none of them were the scout team, not sure why that’s so complicated to comprehend.