Thank goodness that season ending beat down at App happened when it did, otherwise we’d be Bottom Ten fodder.
Thank goodness that season ending beat down at App happened when it did, otherwise we’d be Bottom Ten fodder.
Maybe not but Wisconsin is also expected to be a national title contender and is ranked #4 in the country and they are playing in Wisconsin. I don't think that spread is as much about WKU being worse this year as it is about Wisconsin being that good and playing at home.
I'm pretty sure that's how it works. And let the chips fall wherever they fall.
I'm just saying for the most part we define teams by how they compete against their better opponents, not their worst.
Clearly bad losses can impact you, but without good wins you don’t get to the NCAA as an at large. Regardless of sport, we always ask who did ya beat.
I know the SBC had a better bowl record than CUSA last post season. However, I thought the NCAA made the financial distribution decision based on the entire season vs just bowl results. Is it definite the SBC received a higher football payout than CUSA once last season ended? I know that was the case after 2016. In fact the league received more than the MAC that year. Not sure about 2017 however.
Reality Check:
I think we win by 2 scores + this weekend. That said, before I make fun of or gloat about anyone being on this list, I am reminded that we are probably one upset loss by a FCS team from being included on this list
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)