We are still a National University at Tier 2 (230 - 301 with no ranking) with USN&WR along with ULM, UNO and now LA Tech who is no longer USN&WR Tier 1 now that they have dropped down to Carnegie R3 with ULM. You are correct, nothing to celebrate as we have achieved nothing with USN&WR. Only LA Tech is the loser, if people want to celebrate that. When we hit Carnegie R1 in 2020, we should achieve Tier 1 with USN&WR (likely in 2021 as they are always a year behind).
Yeah, the headline on the school website is "Louisiana Tech makes USNWR National Universities list for eighth straight year" .... no more trying to imply that they are better than everyone else.
So to be clear, they have now regressed in the two most important school rankings: dropped from T1 to T2 in the USNWR, and.....much more important....from R2 to R3 in the Carniege study.
Definitely not a very good trend they got going there.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/23/us/un....html?ofs=fbia
Friday morning reading about the rankings done by USNWR
I understood that the percentage of alumni giving was a major difference between LaTex and UL. I also understood that LaTex classified a part of the graduation fee as alumni giving in order to increase the percentage reported. Gaming the system.
Who at UL is responsible for providing up to date data to USN&WR? We should be Tier 1 based on previous data that LA Tech submitted that made them Tier 1 before their demotion. While R1 is the designation we desire, why not get Tier 1 as well now? It may be based on a lot of subjective data, but it is what high schools use as university data. We need to understand the criteria and take steps to reach the required levels. It creates perception and dictates in part how we are perceived. So, why not focus on it now as we continue to pursue R1 status?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)