Because people are not hired based off how well your college did in football the previous year. I all for having a student fee but the students need to have a voice in the matter. I can vividly remember working all summer to pay for my school and becoming enraged when a saw $175 cheerleading fee. On the other hand, I voted for the new union and was happy to pay that fee because I knew I voted for it.
I was under the impression that all all public universities had a budget and requested funding from the state. If there are shortfalls, positions/programs are cut or tuition is raised to cover them. It is not done by the individual institutions. It makes sense that unilaterally assessing fees without government or taxpayer approval would be circumventing the arrangement these public schools have. Putting the vote directly to the consumer (student) is the fairest and most equitable way to make the changes students want. Right now they don’t care about making our athletic budget larger.
..... OK need some help on this....... T Joe headed up the Dept which regulated the use of state budget funds devoted to athletics.... he allowed a % I think up to 6%....... upon his becoming pres of UL he didn't give the athletic dept the full amount but used a different funding method that actually gave more bucks to athletics...… can someone refresh us on the method he used?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)