I'm just giving a marketing growth philosophy.
I know of no university that is geared for long term growth. Instead they go for immediate return.
A student on the 50 will recruit. A student up in the elsewhere may not even admit going to the game.
Again just thoughts, no iron clad examples.
TAMU is at 50 in middle & upper decks. ROTC is lower. They also get the sun side like UL BUT they PAY for it. Ticket costs are added into studwnt costs if you attend games or not. Over $500 semester. Students are vested into & as such almost always show up.
Want 50.....pay for it
This is Fresno State Visitor Side or east side this would be the solution about putting premium seating between the 40's on our East side. Still can put Students at the bottom between the 40's.
"Ticket costs are added into student costs if you attend games or not. Over $500 semester."
I posted about this before. If, for example, we add $150 per semester for ticket costs for all students, that is $300 per year. At about 20,000 students, that is $6,000,000 in additional ticket sales or student fees or whatever you want to call them. That is a small price for students to pay and when added to tuition, which is already among the lowest in the country, it is or should not be a prohibitive cost to attending UL. As he stated, students become vested into athletics and tend to show up for games. Athletics can do a lot with a guaranteed $6,000,000 per year.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)