Originally Posted by
Ray Finkle
Okay, let me bounce this idea. We all agree that most of our guys go to the summer leagues and destroy the competition, right? For instance, all of our hitters perform significantly better than in the regular season - especially the hitters. Now, why is that?
We agree that the Cape and Alaska leagues are the real deal so let's set those aside and focus exclusively on the rest. A majority of our players go to other leagues outside of the cape so most of the higher averages we all see summer after summer can be sampled from other leagues, fair to say right?
Now, focusing only on the summer leagues outside of the Cape and Alaska. If you are saying these leagues are high quality, then it might also be safe to assume that the summer leagues are at a minimal a continuation in the skill level of players or possibly better than normal season sample set, right? I agree with you here as well, the talent pool is better. (rhetorical here, just some discourse for sake of exchanging ideas) Then, if the summer league is so similar (or even better) as far as the skill level goes, then, again, why do our guys play better in the summer in the spring? If the assumption is that the spring and summer are more or less the same, then it would be safe to assume that the only difference could be attributed to a single variable. That variable being JT - doesn't stick. I want the guy gone, but I don't believe he is the single factor. Given that I believe it is a multivariate relation as to why the players perform better in the summer than in the fall, I attribute my reasons in my previous post as the reasons why (obviously). None of my reasons have to do with the level of talent, only environmental factors.
I can agree that the level of talent is for real, but with different environments, the game not meaning anything, lack of pressure, etc - I can see why the play better.