As I mentioned earlier, I think that would be a major obstacle in this community. You've seen temporary taxes shot down in recent years that would benefit the public such as library taxes, drainage and government building improvements and schools. I think this is easier said than done in this area where there are a lot of conservatives who get real loud about no more taxes.
I never understand the big stadium talk. As MAT correctly pointed out, attendance is down and will most likely follow college basketball with less and less attendance. The stadium needs to be as high end as possible with the number of seats kept as small as possible. Right now there is no demand for our product. If by some miracle we would get into a big time conference we should expand. Considering our historical attendance I would build something with 30 to 35k seats.
Also, a local tax is a non starter. We will have to raise this ourselves.
I don't think it's just conservatives, but also people that have been burned by tax initiatives that had language that allowed local government, or the school board to use the money for other purposes outside of it's stated intent.
You mentioned the library taxes failed, but there was no need to renew it when our government has built new libraries around the parish and remodel the main library downtown. Oh, by the way there is still $40 Mil in the account today. There was no purpose to renew the tax, unless it was local governments intention to use the funds for other purposes.
People don't trust our local government and the school board to use the funds for the original intent.
If we are going to build anew, you don't short yourself on future growth. We've gotten 40k and close to 40k a few times. If you build a 30k stadium, it better be built in such a way that future expansion to 50k could easily be done. Some 30k designs presented here do not allow future expansion.
IMHO, you build a 40k with options for 50k down the road in case we do become the next Boise.
Personally I say we rebuild the entire home side of Cajun Field. Also we get rid of the grass part, and put stands there. So we can keep the capacity at 30,000. We just will not use the Visitor Side until we can get the funds to complete it.
To me that is the really the only solution. I think the reason why we have to keep Cajun Field because it is easily expandable, we have already put money in the SEZ project, and we could renovate a structure that could be there for 100 yrs., and have a structure that is actually made of concrete.
You never build anything with a usage plan of 30+ years by looking at what is going on in a short time frame. The program is down now, that is not your gauge. With being in the sucky Sunbelt, and any excitement, Cajun Field has seen 36K, 38K, and over 41K. It is ridiculous and down right stupid to set your limit at 35-40K and not to expect surpassing that. You recently hired a staff, both administrative and coaches, with a success goal in mind. Make absolutely sure the facilities can support a growth in success, or why even try? Minimum, 40K - 50K.
There are currently 40 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 40 guests)