As opposed to your strange attraction to good looking local HS Caucasian QB's? I'm not into local hero worship of the latest home grown star. I'm okay with any QB that can run the offense and wins more often than loses, regardless of ethnicity. But I'm also intelligent enough to understand that if your pride of Acadiana QB is not getting snaps with the 1st and 2nd unit in practice, he will probably be holding a clipboard on the sideline during the season.
Coach Napier stated that we will have enough QB's on campus in August to run daily practices that way the staff wants to work. Hence the walk-on's at QB.
You are a hater and a BLAMER. It takes all kind to make the world go round. I'm happy with who I am and what I stand for. I could give a rats ___ about who you are or what you stand for.
I made a football comment, not either a sexual or racial one. But only you would turn it into that.
Good riddance my friend.
I know CajunT, and know for a fact, he only wants best for the program. I don't think he is biased towards any particular trait. I think he has his own opinion of who he likes. I support CajunT totally. No reason to bash T, he is a complete UL supporter. Everyone has an opinion, I do respect CajunT's. Let's not try and pin anyone into a corner, he has valuable input as do you CajunVic.
Truce
Napier has said the walk on program will be a major part of the football plan. No. you are allowed is somewhere around 30 to 40. Not surprising many QB's will be brought in as they generally are the best athletes on their HS teams. Only 1 to 2 will actually man the QB position in practice.
Sorry, but T (which I now believe stands for Turd) just sounded off like the person that he has proven to be.
Look at the time it took to respond. It is quite obvious that he had to get a couple or 10 cold ones in to come up with the analysis he provides and what he now says.
As for not trashing the T, why not. He has never missed an opportunity to trash a young athlelete even after demonstrating that he really knows not a damn thing about them. It should be done unto T as T does unto others, especially young Atheletes.
In good faith, I extended the olive branch. You just saw how the guy you know so well responded. You can have that turd of a friend.
At this point, you and T have insert chosen to insert race into this. I identified two quarterbacks which T has chosen to trash in one way or another on this board, idemtofed that fact and said that I hoped one of them pushes the entire group of QB'si to a level that we end up with one (ANY ONE OF THEM ON THE TEAM) that can run Napier offense next year.
Fact: Earlier on this board when I gave objective discussion about what posters knew or did not know in their QB discussions, I was accused of being Levi's mom.
Fact: Those two QB's have each trait I identified.
Fact: T trashed both on this board for no real apparent reason, one who is still in high school, has never even participated in a practice at this university and I would venture to say has not been seen live by the head coach in a game as his high school career had ended before the head coach was hired.
Fact: T got -fumble- by the post and chose to attack me by bringing race and sex into the attack - obviously because he had nothing he could say to attack based on the substance of the post.
Fact: Houston UL Grad took up for T generally as a big UL supporter which I have never ever questioned.
Fact: I immediately offered a truce.
Fact: Five or so hours latter into midnight on a Saturday, T chose to reject the truce and attach me again, this time with being drunk - look at those facts and go figure.
Fact: Like many smarts on this board who think only their analysis is gold, T then tried to tear off my head and ____ in my neck showing the true T which is not the T that Houston UL Grad described.
Fact: I withdrew the offer of an olive branch as it was unequivically rejected.
🤔
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)