Truce
Truce
Napier has said the walk on program will be a major part of the football plan. No. you are allowed is somewhere around 30 to 40. Not surprising many QB's will be brought in as they generally are the best athletes on their HS teams. Only 1 to 2 will actually man the QB position in practice.
Sorry, but T (which I now believe stands for Turd) just sounded off like the person that he has proven to be.
Look at the time it took to respond. It is quite obvious that he had to get a couple or 10 cold ones in to come up with the analysis he provides and what he now says.
As for not trashing the T, why not. He has never missed an opportunity to trash a young athlelete even after demonstrating that he really knows not a damn thing about them. It should be done unto T as T does unto others, especially young Atheletes.
In good faith, I extended the olive branch. You just saw how the guy you know so well responded. You can have that turd of a friend.
At this point, you and T have insert chosen to insert race into this. I identified two quarterbacks which T has chosen to trash in one way or another on this board, idemtofed that fact and said that I hoped one of them pushes the entire group of QB'si to a level that we end up with one (ANY ONE OF THEM ON THE TEAM) that can run Napier offense next year.
Fact: Earlier on this board when I gave objective discussion about what posters knew or did not know in their QB discussions, I was accused of being Levi's mom.
Fact: Those two QB's have each trait I identified.
Fact: T trashed both on this board for no real apparent reason, one who is still in high school, has never even participated in a practice at this university and I would venture to say has not been seen live by the head coach in a game as his high school career had ended before the head coach was hired.
Fact: T got -fumble- by the post and chose to attack me by bringing race and sex into the attack - obviously because he had nothing he could say to attack based on the substance of the post.
Fact: Houston UL Grad took up for T generally as a big UL supporter which I have never ever questioned.
Fact: I immediately offered a truce.
Fact: Five or so hours latter into midnight on a Saturday, T chose to reject the truce and attach me again, this time with being drunk - look at those facts and go figure.
Fact: Like many smarts on this board who think only their analysis is gold, T then tried to tear off my head and ____ in my neck showing the true T which is not the T that Houston UL Grad described.
Fact: I withdrew the offer of an olive branch as it was unequivically rejected.
🤔
I primarily read RP because of the insight T and BB bring to this forum. Vic . . . not so much.
I likewise agree that both bring valuable insight to this board and I generally enjoy reading what both write. That does not mean that one has to agree with the substance of EVERY single post that they or anyone makes. This is a fan message board and as such there should be no issue with an alternate view from time to time. That's it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)