How can you bring up cherry picking in one breath but then immediately poo poo a comprehensive stat like the RPI and cherry pick a stat like quality wins.
RPI, BPI, ELO, Massey, Sagrin, etc. are all comprehensive statistical accounts of how good your team is. They are the opposite of cherry picking.
Our games against Clemson and Ole Miss don’t make a difference if we don’t take care of all the other games on the schedule.
Keep in mind that D1 college basketball has something like 340 teams. The pool of teams is so huge that there are always going to be big fluctuations. In college football the #90 team is much better than the #120 team. In college basketball when the #90 and #120 play its close to a tossup.
RPI AND quality wins AND success in big games.
No doubt that’s subjective, but one objective measure doesn’t tell the story.
I like Marlin. I think he has improved the program. I think the improvement is very shallow, though and it is time to have more success against better teams. Simply pointing to RPI or total wins doesn’t tell the story. I like the wins, I like the RPI, but we need to win some games against good teams.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)