I don't disagree with anyone that says we should have higher aspirations and that our scheduling is soft and needs to be improved. I have _____ed about Marlin in the past but I do think the ship is more on the incline than decline. When you look at the pieces coming back and his best (on paper) freshman class coming in, I believe we are in a position to make a nice run in next few years.
The thing I can't get on board with is the post season or bust mentality. I want to be in the post season every year but due to the conference being a 1 bid league, I can't judge a good or bad season based on post season. This year we are in the NIT with 27 win, next season we can win 20 and be in the NCAA tourney, or win 25 and not get in the NIT or the NCAA tourney. Is that 20 win season better than the other 2 strictly because it ended in the tourney? I want to consistently compete for titles and post season births but not to the point that I will view a non post season as bad.
The conference as a whole needs to schedule better to improve its standing. UL can schedule a murderers row but if everyone else is scheduling cupcakes it won't matter in the long run.
Going to consolidate a couple of things as I’ve been banned to smart phone for almost a year.
There’s a lot of hyperbole on this board, and the use of terms everyone, everybody, always, etc are short cuts, and yes everyone understands this because in life and nature few things are absolute under all conditions.
We absolutely can do better than Bob, we could also do a lot worse. I’m always voting with confidence we can do better than mediocrity. We’ll be back in the pack in 2019/20. Don’t fire Bob, but no extension, no raises until this season becomes the norm, not the outlier.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)