What a joke. I figured as much with Oklahoma because of their hot start and having such a name that the NCAA can sell in Trey Young but I can't believe that Syracuse was included. It baffles me that they even came up for selection. The team that is getting screwed the most that nobody is referencing is Oklahoma State who beat OU and Kansas twice. I just don't get it.
The committee did not make it all about RPI. They clearly stated that they wanted to see who you beat. Had it been about RPI, MTSU would have been in the field as well as Louisville, St. Mary's etc..
295? The below link has Oklahoma State in the 60's. OSU also beat Kansas twice, Florida State, Oklahoma, Texas Tech etc.. OU and Syracuse got lucky.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...e-sos-by-other
Ok, then let's go with BPI. OSU BPI was at 57. Still not good enough for an at-large. OU and Cuse had better resumes than OSU, but none of these should have been in the tournament anyway.
Your link looks like it's a betting site.
USA Today references their 295 non-conference SOS. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...day/414183002/
Let's look at their OOC schedule
Pepperdine 5-26
Charlotte 5-23
Oral Roberts 8-20
Texas A&M 20-12
Pitt 8-24
Houston Baptist 3-25
Austin Peay 16-14
Mississippi Valley State 4-28
Wichita State 25-7
Florida State 20-11
Tulsa 19-12
UTRGV 13-17
Arkansas 23-11
Overall 169-232
You might need to check some of those records.
I don't think Arkansas had a 23-11 ooc record; looks more like over-all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)