We know Napier was behind the 8 ball with this year's class. Last coach wrecked relationships with many HS staffs. The early signing period really threw a monkey wrench into things. He only had a few weeks to build a staff to try and piece together a decent signing class.
All of us should have seen this coming. To expect an eye popping class this season was really wishful thinking. Now, I fully expect this staff to absolutely crush the next class.
Just to give you guys an idea of where we need to go, these are 24/7 class rankings of certain regional foes.
#66 Tulane. (20) 3-stars
#73 Houston. (19) 3-stars
#76 Louisiana Tech. (16) 3-stars
#81 Southern Miss. (19) 3-stars
#85 UTSA. (16) 3-stars
#86 Memphis. (16) 3-stars
#88 Arkansas State. (14) 3-stars
#89 SMU. (15) 3-stars
#125 Louisiana. (4) 3-stars
First, this years class is decent considering how it went down, and we had a little disappointment at the end. Again, not totally unexpected. However, I do think Napier realizes we must improve for next year to get where we need to go in the future, and I am confident that will happen. I expect UL to be 2nd in the state next year at this time.
I got a little different understanding. I'm pretty sure he said that he'd have been pleased if he knew he'd get these players with a full recruiting season to get them. That he's confident we can compete successfully against SBC teams with this quality class.
His only complaint is that we're short handed on the 85 limit, and will be so even after next years 25 limit to use. He was especially complimentary about the character, work ethic, and football athleticism of the recruits.
Not to disparage those rankings, they are meaningless at the G5 level. Example is that one of our staff members heavily involved in our recruiting decisions thinks Moncrief is the best player in the class. He is a 2 star guy and some of his other offers were FBS schools. Note I would say the same were we ranked higher.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)