I'm assuming you've been reading this site longer than you've been posting... but VO and Express have given numerous arguments to go along with their "complaining" over the years. As their arguments get countered, it certainly helps folks like me understand how tenuous of a situation basketball scheduling is for us... and how massively difficult it is to navigate a course to a better RPI (through scheduling)... for a UL. But the people in question are not chronic complainers that offer no solutions/suggestions.
Regarding the pay to play tournaments. I understand people not getting excited about them. However consider this scenario. Let's suppose this year's team goes 14 and 4 in conference but gets the 2nd seed because of a tiebreaker. They then go on to lose in the conference tournament finals. That likely gives them an overall record of 26 and 8. Do you know where they will go in the post-season. Book it that they would be in the CIT or an equivalent pay for play tournament. That is because NIT takes all conference champs that do not get into the NCAA tournament. Such a season would have the squad deserving of post season play, much more so than a 6 and 6 football team going to a bowl game. Unfortunate that their only option is pay to play. I think the scenario I described would have more fan support to play in the CIT than in the past. Of course, the easy solution is to win the regular season. I vote for that option.
I presume your prediction assumes a loss at Clemson and a 14 and 4 conference record. I would take that right now as that would likely put us as either the first or second seed. I don't generally make many predictions about the Cajuns because if I predict they will do well I almost certainly jinx them. I do think we will have a winning conference record but that is as far as I will go. It would be interesting to see what others think as the scheduling discussion has been interesting and informative. However, until it is discussed with Dr. Maggard or the staff, we don't know if it is possible to change it much. Next season can't have much of a change because of contractual obligations to continue the series from this season. I think it is time to focus on the actual team and the remainder of the season as the non conference portion ends Friday.
Warren Nolan is projecting us to be 16-3 in our remaining regular season games, 16-2 in conference. His algorithm has us tied with GaSo for the regular season championship, with road losses to UTA and GaSo the sole blemishes on our record. I hope he is right, but I seriously doubt that he is.
He has much more confidence than I in Marlin's ability to beat GaSt on the road and UTA in the Dome. I also do not expect us to sweep the rest of the conference, though we are clearly better than all Conference teams other than UTA and GaSo who are better than we are, and GaSt , who is close to the same as us. I expect us to lose 3 of our 4 games with UTA and the Georgia schools, and to lose at least 3 more conference games of the 7 we have against ULM, Troy, Coastal and South Alabama. I expect us to beat Appy here and to sweep Little Rock, stAte and TX St.
I am predicting 12-6 and tied for 4th in the regular season. That is consistant with the history of Marlin coached teams for the last 8 years.
There are currently 99 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 99 guests)