I see what Express is saying. You keep reiterating that we need this "culture change". Implying that if someone has any ties whatsoever to UL's past... they're out... and only those that have no ties here... have the ability to create an "improved culture". Express is correct in reminding you that Hud had no ties to UL when he got here. And he brought in a culture called "Saunders" from Mississippi... that crapped all over our program.
I don't think we can select anyone whatsoever outside of Hud and have the same culture. There are a lot of coaches that put up with being part of a staff under complete _______s. That does not make them part of the prior culture. So... as much as I doubt we even have a person that has UL ties in our top 5... if they were qualified... I'd dismiss this "culture" argument.
I'm not saying UL doesn't need a cultural change from Hud. But what exactly does eliminating people that have had ties to UL have to do with our football culture? Baldwin had no ties to UL. Was that an automatic plus on his resume?