That’s what I’m saying, I️ don’t care about the dressing..go find a good football coach who wins games. People like to say what they want or think, which is fine until “that guy” isn’t a good football coach. Satterfield wasn’t a sexy hire or win the press conference guy, he is a damn solid football coach. If we have the right AD in place it shouldn’t be hard.
I like the way that Penn State program is run. They compete at a high level and do things the right way. If he would bring that with him, I'm all for it.
Yes. I agree. I think he's obviously a good coach and may make a fine HC one day but not sure how that translates here. When you are a big name P5 coach and you switch areas from which you are comfortable, you can recruit all the same just due to your name and possibly the institution you are at. Here, we need to make a bit of a name hire and someone who will perk the ears of the recruits and their coaches in the immediate areas.
Well, I was just thinking that today could possibly be the last game day of the Hud regime. LET HOPE RETURN!!!!
I think if he just starts losing, you have a much different sentiment around here. What Mark Hudspeth failed to understand, and still fails to understand, is that you don't insult Cajun people. I mean, no one should insult their donors and fanbase, but ESPECIALLY HERE, especially concerning politics. This is a religious, conservative area. People have strong convictions. I believe that is the basis of the vitriol.
When Cajuns are with you, it's ride or die.
When you insult them, you're dead to them.
Anyone married to a Cajun woman? I rest my case.
Ok....Yes, he is a good coach. But, that's not what I was saying when I was referring to the type of coach I think would fit best and succeed the most at UL. I want a coach that will have an aggressive style on offense and with the ability to pass the ball downfield. Yes, a good defense is always welcome and is required. I may not be saying it clearly enough, but the way to squeeze out the most success from our program level, is to have a high octane offense that can throw. That is the way to beat better talented teams. It's been proven, time and time again. I'm not concentrating on Sun Belt teams, because those should be winnable if your team is capable of beating the best G5 and the lower P5 teams. At our level, we could look like we have an excellent defensive team, with a nice looking, productive running game, and then when you go against a real football team, like a top G5 or any P5, they will crush you (haven't we seen that enough). If you have an explosive passing game, you can compete with better teams. Look at UH (Briles, then Sumlin, then Herman), Look at Boise.....Look even at those bums La Tech when they have a good passing game. It really works, and it could work here.
There is no rule that if your head coach comes from defense that you can’t have a dynamic offense and vice versa. App states head coach is from the offense side of the ball and they play great defense. If you have a head coach that is great at defense and hires a great OC and stays out of his way them what’s the problem? Look what kiffin was able to do with Alabamas offense and what they were doing to people. Did anyone ever think Saban would let somebody open up the offense? A good coach is a good coach, regardless of where his “expertise” is coming from is my point. Personally don’t think you can say we can’t have a dynamic offense if we hire a head coach that comes from defense.
No rule, correct. We don't have Alabama talent, we don't even have Boise talent, that plays a role in what type of system you run. I may not convince you or others, but I have seen plenty of football to know, defensive coaches tend to be more conservative on offensive play calling. It's in their blood.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)