Ok. Something we can agree on. I will agree that we cannot win with strictly LA players. But if we can revert to the days, as Jay mentioned where we did get BCS talent from LA then our options in LA become very good.
igeaux.mobi
Ok. Something we can agree on. I will agree that we cannot win with strictly LA players. But if we can revert to the days, as Jay mentioned where we did get BCS talent from LA then our options in LA become very good.
igeaux.mobi
The basketball landscape has changed in Louisiana. We are no longer thought of as a great place to play basketball like we were during the Fletcher/Evans era. Coach Lee has really hurt the value of Cajuns basketball. Lee has done a great job of getting guys to go to class and stay on track to graduate, but we are not an Ivy League school. I want kids to go to class and graduate, but I want to win more.
I do agree with you that we need to recruit Houston and Dallas a lot harder. But we have had success landing great players from all over not just Louisiana and Texas. Guys like Tyrone Foster, Marcus Allen, Barry Bowman, Anthony Johnson and others all chose to come to UL. We have great facilities and HAD a great atmosphere it was easier for us to draw kids in but we have to change the Culture that has set in since Lee has taken over.
I think Louisiana ties for a coach should be a minor qualification. If you are a solid coach with a track record of success, you will be able to get kids. Lee has tons of Louisiana ties and has lost most of the contested recruiting battles in-state. What is important is not where the kids grow up, but what kind of program do we have to offer. Right now we are about nothing. Are we an up-tempo team? Are we a half court sets team? Do we like to play pressure defense or zone? Do we have a finesse or physical style of play? The answer is we are a rudderless ship. That is why we suck.
The next coach will have to chart a direction for the program and sell that to recruits. Being for LA or getting kids from LA will have very little to do with his ultimate success.
It would appear that Louisiana es for a coach or anyone at the university is pretty critical given our current coaches and administrators. A huge percentage of our coaches are either UL alumni or alumni of state colleges in Louisiana including our President and AD. A lot of our football coaching staff are UL grads. Many of our head coaches and staff are UL grads. I wonder if any other university has as many of its alums in such key positions.
I don't know if that is good or bad. I do know, UL athletics has been horrible for a long time and equating the two is not difficult to do. Do we need to go outside to bring in better coaches or keep it in the family with a better grade of coach?
When you say UL athletics have been horrible for a long time, exactly what do you mean?
Our baseball team is coached by someone from Louisiana. It is horrible? Our softball team is coached by an alum. Is it horrible? Until Coach Lee took over, our basketball team was surely respectable.
Explain.
Turbine:
Add this to your formula. "Never more than 4 and never less than 2 in any 1 recruiting class. Always have 2 in every class contributing." Stack that up over a 4 or 5 year period and see where it leads. I tried it with my 1st Div.1 headcoaching job and it worked. Didn't get to finish it with my 2nd Div.1 head coaching job.
Moral of the story. You will never lose the ranch and you will always be stable and in the thick of your conference race (hench, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 1st). It will work if you will stick with the plan.
But what do I know ? That's just my opinion. Good Luck Down there, SPECIAL PLACE IN OUR HEARTS. HATE TO SEE THE GOOD GUYS STRUGGLE.
Headragincajun
First of all, your point was not necessarily clear to begin with. First, you pull this list of players that spans 30 years and then go on to say that this program would "win the SBC every year if you can recruit Houston and LA". However to support your argument, you are using Willis Reed as an example? Come on. This state has had some great players come out of it but to suggest that it annually produces high quality, program building talent is FALSE. Even the players currently playing in college were spread out over several years and no offense, but players like Monroe, Tasmin Mitchell, Cooper etc..were never really going to come here. Even when the cajuns were a very consistent program, we were not a target for the high tier players, especially post players who are coveted by all major BCS programs. If you have to hinge your programs on the hopes of maybe 2-3 state prospects per year, you're in trouble. I understand and agree with what C4Life was saying and I also understand your point. However, you have very few recruits that come out in the state yearly in relation to the number of universities trying to land them outside of the blue chip players who will go to larger programs anyhow.
I am thinking of basketball, track & field, soccer, volleyball and tennis as not being good. Horrible may have been an exaggeration, but not for some sports. Some are improving but have a ways to go. Softball is the one exception as it has been excellent for a long time. Baseball was excellent and is now average. Women's basketball became excellent with an NCAA birth, but has since dropped in the toilet, as has men's basketball. Men's Basketball was respectable before Lee took over. Both men's and women's basketball post Death Penalty were respectable with coaches from outside of Louisiana. Both Lee and Rogers are from Louisiana and Rogers is a UL alum. Football was horrible with a head coach from Louisiana and is now elevated to average and improving with a head coach from outside of Louisiana. Several of the assistant coaches are either UL alums or other Louisiana colleges.
I am posing a question, not forming a conclusion. Some Louisiana coaches have excelled while others have not. That is not a blanket statement, just relevant to certain sports. From Dr. S to Blanco to Walker and everyone in between, it was all UL people with little to no outside influence. And, that extended to many of our coaches and now our new President. Does UL have a disproportionate number of alumni in coaching and executive management positions relative to other universities? We have done business the same way for decades now and look where that has gotten us, at least under Dr. S. Does the possible lack of outside influence, i.e. people from BCS programs who bring new ideas and ways of operating at a higher level, hinder us at all? I am just posing the questions for discussion. Feel free to voice your opinion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)