It figures that you have to "bend it" to support your argument. There are two biological sexes. And regardless of how "modernists" separate the human sex biology and "gender" biology... there are still only two gender patterns (male and female) . Just because everything from hormone levels to nature/nurture influences "bend" gender assignments toward each other in a "spectrum"... does not change the science that explains it all. If I found myself hovering in between the patterns... for perhaps very good scientific reasons... I would rally for "gender fluidity" and the "natural continuum". I'm not condemning anyone for their gender pattern. But there are two distinct genders. "Bending" one way or the other from your sex assignment... or having actual sex organ/hormonal abnormalities... does not define another sex any more than it defines another gender.
Pregnant females, hormone-wise, are not "bent" in sex assignment. But they are hormonally almost as distinct from non pregnant females as they are males. That does not define a third sex... and just because it "bends" their behavior... it doesn't define another gender. Science explains the state of a pregnant woman without need of a "continuum". Science also can explain to the intelligent scientist that there are two human sexes... two human genders... and everything else is an abnormality of nature or nurture.
Oh... and I thought you said "banana plug"... and I was going to agree with you. But when I realized you wanted a "banana slug" to help you with human sex and gender... I realized that you're bent.
There are currently 27 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 27 guests)