I don't want to play another FBS start up that's my beef with scheduling them, but maybe the presidents do not want to be associated with a school that is known as a diploma mill, whose founder blamed 9/11 on gay people and several other outlandish claims. Liberty is a disaster waiting to happen, they hire Baylor's EX AD who was forced to resign from his last job because he was involved in a conspiracy to cover up rape by his players. You keep saying it should only be about sports, but these are first and foremost academic institutions, and rightly or wrongly the other schools in your athletics conference create associations between those schools and your own in the minds of the public, and no one in their right minds wants to have their school's reputation tied to that of Liberty's, and/or risk alumni refusing to donate or otherwise turn their backs because they don't approve of what Liberty does.
Well, they teach wacko liberal ideals at west coast colleges like Cal Berkeley and most would jump at the chance to be in a conference with them. I would personally prefer conservative values. But we are talking athletics. It shouldn't matter any more than religious beliefs taught by Baylor or Notre Dame
Let me preface this by saying, I am not on the "going independent" bandwagon.
But to clarify what's quoted here...I don't think Notre Dame needed the ACC as an aid in scheduling football games. The ACC wanted Notre Dame to play 5 of their teams each year as part of the deal letting them in the conference for all of the other sports.
Notre Dame has never, and probably will never, have any trouble scheduling football games.
UL, as an independent, on the other hand...
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)