I agree that many fans don't care anymore about basketball at schools like ours. A couple of back to back NCAA tournament appearances could change that. As far as home schedule is concerned we are still facing issue that schools like USM, Tulane, Rice, Houston, and Lamar refuse to play us home and home. Now you can add UNO to that number. Paying people to come here would likely hurt RPI as you would pay SWAc schools to come here and you would get only a few more to attend that game than a D2 school would draw. D2 has no impact on RPI unless you lose so in some ways you are better off with that approach. So what can be done about it. I like the idea of going to a place twice for a return visit here but the staff does not want to do that. Travel and impact on school is one reason. They don't want to play 18 road games and 13 home games as would result at times with that approach. In general, I would be OK with a few more road games but neither I nor anyone here is being listened to when it comes to scheduling decisions
Mike you've bought into the it can't be done catagory. I'm pretty sure Dr. Maggard won't accept this style of scheduling excuses for too long.
The reason we cannot get home and home with some teams you mentioned is our own abismal RPI. I'm suggesting teams in the top 100 RPI Mike, not SWAC, or SLC teams. You have to be more interested in your RPI than your bottom line.
But Marlin is in good company that's the way almost every SBC team schedules.
I am not in category it cannot be done. As I said earlier I would play a few more road games to improve RPI. You may also have a point in that were we to have notable success for a couple of years, we may be able to attract higher quality opponents to come here. As things stand however, we will not be able to get teams in the top 100 to come here with out doing things like 2 for 1. I already said I would consider such a move for some teams
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)