Google Chrome Issued Flaw

[cajunhawk]

Turbine, we have to figure out this problem. Traffic is almost non existent and it's because of this "warning" or block that's occurring. Do you need some extra funding to fix this issue? If so, let's get this going. I'll make the first pledge.

Whatever we need to do, we need to get this site jumping again. Traffic = exposure = good for program.

This is wrong...I have always been told I'm the reason RP sucks.

[GeauxCajuns]

I'm the reason RP sucks.

[Cajunsmike]

I was using Google Chrome and I couldn't get on. Went back to IE only for RP and Chrome for the rest of my exploring.

That is the process I use to access the site. Also, my company also recently banned the site. More outfits may be doing the same.

[cajunhawk]

Honey...no.

[ULGrad@HOU]

Traffic does seem to be way down. It really needs to be fixed. Turbine, why the silence? It doesn't help that there is a lot less excitement for the upcoming football season, but that warning is the biggest reason, imo.

[Turbine]

Traffic does seem to be way down. It really needs to be fixed. Turbine, why the silence? It doesn't help that there is a lot less excitement for the upcoming football season, but that warning is the biggest reason, imo.

Nothing I can say will fix the vulnerabilities of Chrome, Firefox and Safari desktop.

Chrome has said they will issue a fix in January.

Their fix will involve blocking their own (automated system) Google ads that cause the problem. (certain ones)

In the mean time I am working to comply (getting files ready) with their current solution which puts 100% of the onus on the site publisher.

If I wasn't worried about preserving posts back to 2002, we would be done already.

[ULGrad@HOU]

Nothing I can say will fix the vulnerabilities of Chrome, Firefox and Safari desktop.

Chrome has said they will issue a fix in January.

Their fix will involve blocking their own (automated system) Google ads that cause the problem. (certain ones)

In the mean time I am working to comply (getting files ready) with their current solution which puts 100% of the onus on the site publisher.

If I wasn't worried about preserving posts back to 2002, we would be done already.

Thank you for the reply Turbine, I understand, and I know you are trying your best. I, like many are just concerned about the site, it's a very valuable asset to the Ragin Cajun family. It's the go to place, and you have nurtured it well.

[CajunAmos]

Nothing I can say will fix the vulnerabilities of Chrome, Firefox and Safari desktop.

Chrome has said they will issue a fix in January.

Their fix will involve blocking their own (automated system) Google ads that cause the problem. (certain ones)

In the mean time I am working to comply (getting files ready) with their current solution which puts 100% of the onus on the site publisher.

If I wasn't worried about preserving posts back to 2002, we would be done already.

Could you create a separate archive for the older posts?

[ManAboutTown]

Honey...no.

Hawk = a better RP
No Hawk = an existence I'm not willing to accept

[ManAboutTown]

I was using Google Chrome and I couldn't get on. Went back to IE only for RP and Chrome for the rest of my exploring.

French man, not necessarily directed at your post, but this is a point of contention with browser sticklers.

If you guys are really concerned about privacy, info protection, OPSEC, etc; I'd suggest sticking to the updated firefox. There are lists of allowable sites in the settings that make it easy to control. Also, if you use safari like me, even better. Also very easy to toggle "warning issued" sites.

As far as anything google, IE, or whatever.. I'd steer clear at all costs.

[cajunhawk]

Could you create a separate archive for the older posts?

Or a separate website...RP Classic.

[GreatestStory]

At first, Google Chrome wouldn't let me load RP, so I started using Internet Explorer.

A few weeks ago, I could no longer access the the site with Internet Explorer.

Now Safari is the only way I can access Ragin Pagin.