The Missouri transfer named Gant is 6'8" and athletic. I don't know how much of a shot blocker he is but he should be quicker on rotations than some of the inside folks playing now. Although his stats were not eye catching at Missouri, he was a Top 40 player nationally coming out of HS. Some folks who followed fall practice say he is the best player on the team. He and the other two transfers will be allowed to play in games that are part of a summer trip to Cuba the program has lined up. That should help them be more in tune with each other next season. From what I understand, we are also looking to bring in an inside player during the spring signing period. I am not aware of all the details in that situation.
Mike at this point in his career it's pointless to bring out his top forty status as a recruit. Clearly he was not happy at Missouri or maybe they were not happy with him, or possibly his play and thus the departure. Judging his top forty status and his lack of production at Missouri means either he was overrated or he was in the wrong system for his abilities. I am hopeful it is the latter.
My only point in bringing up the Top 40 status for Gant out of HS is that probably indicates he has some talent and athletic ability. Those attributes should allow him to be a good inside defensive player which is something we lack now. Someone asked about our rim protection potential next year and he will be a key there. Agree that what he did at Missouri may not be indicative of his ability. Frank Bartley averaged 4 ppg at BYU and is at about 15 here despite a few down games in the middle of the year. I have heard some say Gant has a chance to be one of the better players in the SBC. That is a projection that I will not put total stock in as who knows what the rest of the league well have. Of the four guys coming in I rate him and Russell to be the keys. It has been awhile since we have brought a guy with the HS shooting stats like Russell and Gant may give us a true inside presence.
[QUOTE=Boomer;982558]
I found all three were very productive which make for an interesting season next year with true depth. All three will get some good minutes. IMO
[QUOTE=cajun4life;982582]
A poor season next year could have a change considered. Of course it depends on how you define "poor". If we have barely a D1 winning season as has been the case recently, do you make a change then? Believe it or not, we still have a chance to do that this year which would be the fourth consecutive year it happens. Next year could make it 5. Express said we need to be in the Top 3 next year for it to be a good season which is very reasonable. We have never fired a coach after a winning season, much less 5 consecutively (granted there is some work remaining to do this year to have it happen). I do know the President likes the way the basketball program is run off the court so that may be a factor I don't know how the new AD will view things like this-moderate success but not to the level of expectations. Personally, I think as long as he has a winning season overall and in conference he will stay until closer to the end of his deal but that is just an opinion. To the point of the previous post, you would hope that we would see progress with the new talent coming on board, including Russell. It would be disappointing to all not to make a significant jump in the standings as a result.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)