I would be ok with not having CIT games count on coaches records. That is not my point. There are some football teams that do not deserve bowl games which get to do so due to number of them. Roughly 60 percent of FBS schools play in bowls while the number of D1 basketball teams on post season play counting the pay tournaments gives a percentage of roughly 45. Both sports have teams that do not deserve post season play do so. As i said earlier, football number may drop as finances will force more bowl games to be canceled. Disney is not happy with ESPN performance and that may impact the situation.
I agree 100%. If the participating teams want to play in them, then the bowls are worth playing. The Poinsettia Bowl's going out of business is not a good thing for any G5 conference member. You can rest assured that the end of this bowl will result in two less G5 teams getting to participate in post season play next year.
100% of NCAA eligible schools participate in the playoff process. You win your conference regular season championship or the tournament and you're in. The football side has never had anything approaching this in FBS.
Frankly I've got a bigger problem with the bowl whiners than participants. As long as the FBS world is a popularity contest we need all bowls. Their financial success is on their committees.
Yes, you cannot turn down a bowl. Look what happened to LTUR. Damage lasted exactly one season.
I cant tell if you two are serious.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)