And to think, 3 - treys in the first 7:20 minutes for P.J.
And to think, 3 - treys in the first 7:20 minutes for P.J.
Hardy would have been a game changer for us when Long was here. I know it's nothing in the big scheme of things, but those gray unis must go. And it won't hurt my feelings if we decide the novelty of that floor is over... and we go to something else.
Individually, the Cajuns played well last night. ULM played us very well defensively. And they have a couple of gifted shot makers. I can't understand, for as much as they collapsed on us down low, that we didn't kill them with the mid range jumpers. We out rebounded them even outnumbered under the basket, but they were very aggressive at the rim. We don't seem to want to get in and kick it back out. Thank goodness for the long range shots. And I have to give it to Marlin... his teams play excellent defense. They lose assignments ever so often... but they hustle huge.
We had trouble finishing inside last night which made our half court offense look stagnant. We did get to the rim several times but could not complete the play. Work on the boards helped negate the finishing problems at times. I give ULM credit for some of those problems. I do agree with J1M in that we perhpas should have shot more mid range jumpers when we beat the guy off the dribble. Stove, Wright, and the two inside guys have made some of those in other games. Stove especially had trouble completing plays and he may have been better off with the mid range shot. Still, ULM was responsible for that issue as they did a good job of contesting every possession. It was obvious they were up for this game due to it being an in state game. Express is correct in that at times Hardy and Brown were beaten by their men. That happens occasionally. Still, we kept them under 40% and you usually win when you do that. What has not been credited enough was the Cajuns FT shooting. After starting 1 for 5, they were nails the rest of the night. We shot one and ones four times last night and made three. That is fine for a shot with that much pressure. Good to see that occur after they struggled in that regard on the Arkansas trip. That needs to continue as we will have to score more to beat Georgia Southern. They scored 86 against Troy last night and have one of the league's best players in Tookie Brown.
Metry you are right in that Hardy has been huge for us from the perimeter this year. Yet, not one person who criticized his signing (and there are a few) has admitted they don't know much about what goes into recruiting. I suspect I will wait a long time before that happens. A lot more goes into it at our level than how many stars a guy has and who else is recruiting someone. How a guy will fit into your system and how he fits your needs is a big part of it. I never expected Hardy to be the zone buster he is. I expected he would be solid defensively due to his speed and not turn the ball over much due to how his brother did at McNeese. I figured he would be more than a solid contributor by his second year. That is another part of recruiting that people don't think about much. How will a guy respond to coaching and how much he can progress with time. It's not all about being a difference maker in Year 1. If that happens, so much the better and that is the case with Hardy this year.
Next Saturday forecast high of 77 with a 50% chance of evening showers. That shouldn't discourage attendance.
You keep bringing this up but no one really criticized the signing on here
https://forumeus.com/...mits-to-Cajuns
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)