Yes...but:
1. The rule does not address or prohibit ANYONE, including the school, from using 'Louisiana' as a stand alone reference. Even the former and incoming ULS presidents have confirmed this. The 'turds may WANT it to be a law, but it is not, so it therefore cannot be considered 'illegal' by any stretch of the imagination. Period.
2. The law that prohibits the usage of 'UL' is so poorly written it isn't worth the toilet paper it was written on, and is unenforceable. Even a 'lawyer' poster on the 'turd board agreed:
"After having read the Policy it is rather ambiguous legally. Firs it says that institutions "should" adhere to the policy not "shall". But then it specifically says that the use of the "University of Louisiana" without the "at ..." is prohibited, but this is part of the policy that "should" be adhered to. This may be double talk to laymen but to a judge it isn't. There is a world of difference between "should" and"shall".
The Policy says the the Act specifically also "authorized the Board of Trustees and Board of Regents to approve the change of name of any university within the System to the "University of Louisiana at (its geographic location)" provided no less than two institutions make a request for and are approved to change the institutional names.
Since the act left it up to the Boards to approve the name changes, unless you guys can find anything else in the Statute, then only the Boards can enforce the policy."
http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showt...n-t-win/page11
Again....not that any of these facts will stop them being the embiciles that's they are. Just makes me that much happier for the recent wins, including the smack down on the cusa board.
good job, LaCajunsFan! i appreciate the documentation.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)