Armed Forces Bowl

[Just1More]

But on the very bright side of things, we did finally get our admin to fight.....and win....to get our legal name recognized by our conference mates, including ULM.
No doubt you've already seen this as you've been skanking around our site for months (despite your lies to the contrary), but here is just a little reminder of that fact:

Who are you saying has been skanking around our site for months (despite lies to the contrary)? I have not lied about skanking around this site. I have openly skanked this site for many years!

[LaCajunsFan]

Who are you saying has been skanking around our site for months (despite lies to the contrary)? I have not lied about skanking around this site. I have openly skanked this site for many years!

Lol...not you. Sorry if I didn't make it clear who I was referring to, and I've now corrected that.

[KajunKrazy]

OK. Tech started 1-3, played in 90+ degree weather in September, played an FCS team that no one cared about, had a home weeknight game, and had 11 AM starts. Also, we didn't have one of our best teams ever. We were in a rebuilding year, and had to replace 7 players that are currently on NFL rosters. So, whatever difference there may have been in the obstacles were negligible.

You sir are a liar. You did play one Thursday game. All of your home games in September were at 6pm. Way less heat than 11 am on sept 2nd. Your only 11am game was in bowling green Kentucky on dec 3rd.

[CajunJack55]

OK. We had a victory bell that you cannot hear, a F Trump video you wish you could unsee, a Tigue debacle extraordinaire, a swim coach AD that is no more, a coach that bench presses 400 lbs twice as many times as his IQ insult half the fan base, LSU's dual threat QB that only threatened bad programs, an NFL open space runner smashed into closed spaces, an offensive line that was a dashed line instead of a solid line, a DC that had to be DQ'd, and a radio clown attempt to tag the world's greatest fans as "faceless buffoons".

That ain't "negligible"! We had a bad year! But we're looking to a brighter tomorrow... Alden-style!

2016 sucked

[31Ragin97]

LA tech has a real QB.

sorry if said elsewhere, but was there ever any update on his dui case? also I read an interesting story about a miss st D-lineman, that was kind of odd, (and old, but not as old as OU Rb's case) yet didn't seem to have much coverage by the mainstream media.

[LaCajunsFan]

You sir are a liar. You did play one Thursday game. All of your home games in September were at 6pm. Way less heat than 11 am on sept 2nd. Your only 11am game was in bowling green Kentucky on dec 3rd.

He is the ultimate liar. But he can't help it: his hate and jealousy of us demands it of him.
In fact, he and a few of the other @ruston idiots were recently smacked down on the cusa board. When a USM fan started a thread about the bowl and lableded it with our legal/correct name of 'Louisiana' the 'turds started their usual b.s. A NON-ltur moderator and others starting questioning them why they had to start their infantile rants about how 'illegal' it was, derailing constant threads about it. They also could not answer the two basic questions posed to them:
1. Provide proof that there is a law.....with specific language prohibiting the usage of 'Louisiana.'
2. If it's so darn 'illegal,' why hasn't anyone ever sued to get us to stop?
Of course it didn't stop the whiny little bi!!tches, lol.

[Boomer]

He is the ultimate liar. But he can't help it: his hate and jealousy of us demands it of him.
In fact, he and a few of the other @ruston idiots were recently smacked down on the cusa board. When a USM fan started a thread about the bowl and lableded it with our legal/correct name of 'Louisiana' the 'turds started their usual b.s. A NON-ltur moderator and others starting questioning them why they had to start their infantile rants about how 'illegal' it was, derailing constant threads about it. They also could not answer the two basic questions posed to them:
1. Provide proof that there is a law.....with specific language prohibiting the usage of 'Louisiana.'
2. If it's so darn 'illegal,' why hasn't anyone ever sued to get us to stop?
Of course it didn't stop the whiny little bi!!tches, lol.

---Yes saw that --pretty cool!!!

[31Ragin97]

so even if how they portrayed the law is correct, why would a Louisiana state law need to be adhered to in Mississippi or Connecticut?
it used to be or may still be illegal to hammer nails in Michigan after ten pm, can anyone at the Bristol office not do that either then?

[LaCajunsFan]

---Yes saw that --pretty cool!!!

Yeah, besides the one where he calls him 'infantile' (among other things), this my favorite post....and it was by one of the mods:

That response did not address my point at all. You're not winning the argument about "Louisiana" especially not with that type of completely flopped response. It has nothing to do with MT. I said, if it were illegal and another institution wanted to challenge it, then they could and as your rambling responses indicate, probably would if they felt as strongly as you do. The fact is, no one has done so and thus the folks in Lafayette will continue to use that branding and do so until they are challenged on it (if they can even be challenged to begin with). I haven't been fed anything by the Cajuns. I have done my own research. You seem to hold a major grudge and I think you may be a little too sensitive on this issue. I am simply stating the facts. Legally, if anyone could challenge it and wanted to do so, why wouldn't they have done so yet? That's all I'm asking and that is what you have failed to answer.

Just too bad that the mods, like our 'friend' cheifsfan and skullymagoo don't grew some nads and do the same thing on our board.

[CajunJack55]

so even if how they portrayed the law is correct, why would a Louisiana state law need to be adhered to in Mississippi or Connecticut?
it used to be or may still be illegal to hammer nails in Michigan after ten pm, can anyone at the Bristol office not do that either then?

It is in no way, shape, or form illegal or against any rules for ESPN or any other media outlet to call us Louisiana, or UL, or University of Louisiana, or anything else...the rule is for how the university refers to itself.

[LaCajunsFan]

It is in no way, shape, or form illegal or against any rules for ESPN or any other media outlet to call us Louisiana, or UL, or University of Louisiana, or anything else...the rule is for how the university refers to itself.

Yes...but:

1. The rule does not address or prohibit ANYONE, including the school, from using 'Louisiana' as a stand alone reference. Even the former and incoming ULS presidents have confirmed this. The 'turds may WANT it to be a law, but it is not, so it therefore cannot be considered 'illegal' by any stretch of the imagination. Period.

2. The law that prohibits the usage of 'UL' is so poorly written it isn't worth the toilet paper it was written on, and is unenforceable. Even a 'lawyer' poster on the 'turd board agreed:

"After having read the Policy it is rather ambiguous legally. Firs it says that institutions "should" adhere to the policy not "shall". But then it specifically says that the use of the "University of Louisiana" without the "at ..." is prohibited, but this is part of the policy that "should" be adhered to. This may be double talk to laymen but to a judge it isn't. There is a world of difference between "should" and"shall".

The Policy says the the Act specifically also "authorized the Board of Trustees and Board of Regents to approve the change of name of any university within the System to the "University of Louisiana at (its geographic location)" provided no less than two institutions make a request for and are approved to change the institutional names.

Since the act left it up to the Boards to approve the name changes, unless you guys can find anything else in the Statute, then only the Boards can enforce the policy."

http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showt...n-t-win/page11

Again....not that any of these facts will stop them being the embiciles that's they are. Just makes me that much happier for the recent wins, including the smack down on the cusa board.

[CajunJack55]

Yes...but:

1. The rule does not address or prohibit ANYONE, including the school, from using 'Louisiana' as a stand alone reference. Even the former and incoming ULS presidents have confirmed this. The 'turds may WANT it to be a law, but it is not, so it therefore cannot be considered 'illegal' by any stretch of the imagination. Period.

2. The law that prohibits the usage of 'UL' is so poorly written it isn't worth the toilet paper it was written on, and is unenforceable. Even a 'lawyer' poster on the 'turd board agreed:

"After having read the Policy it is rather ambiguous legally. Firs it says that institutions "should" adhere to the policy not "shall". But then it specifically says that the use of the "University of Louisiana" without the "at ..." is prohibited, but this is part of the policy that "should" be adhered to. This may be double talk to laymen but to a judge it isn't. There is a world of difference between "should" and"shall".

The Policy says the the Act specifically also "authorized the Board of Trustees and Board of Regents to approve the change of name of any university within the System to the "University of Louisiana at (its geographic location)" provided no less than two institutions make a request for and are approved to change the institutional names.

Since the act left it up to the Boards to approve the name changes, unless you guys can find anything else in the Statute, then only the Boards can enforce the policy."

http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showt...n-t-win/page11

Again....not that any of these facts will stop them being the embiciles that's they are. Just makes me that much happier for the recent wins, including the smack down on the cusa board.

Agree on all accounts.