Your point is well taken.
I somewhat agree with your last sentence, but I prefer the raw truth. In buckelys case, his style can be volatile, but it's a win/win for the reader IMO. If he's right in his "assumption", you get the full story. If he's wrong, you get the response from readers and a lot of times, the parties involved.
It may make you happy but its a boat with no anchor.
Knowing something now, without connected dot documentation is worth less than the paper it isn't written on.
Some people call it fake news.
Bad health can "force" you out.
"Forced out" without a story is worthless.
It is not the truth.
Buckley is not the arbiter of truth.
It's fine for people on this message board to say they know the truth but for Buckley to do it when it is contrary to everything that every news outlet publishes, then he has no integrity unless he proves it.
what article are you now talking about, please post link, as the article title posted in this thread says "photos", im not seeing the other article
So an official release or stance by the university is the arbiter of truth? No. The truth is the truth.
Turbine's BS about connecting dots has nothing to do with Buckley saying he was forced out. If the reader wants a back story, said reader has multiple avenues to investigate and form their own opinion.
"Truth, what is that?"
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)