
Originally Posted by
CajunT
He was probably told off the record and made the statement with some assumption on his part. Now I can understand why that is a problem with some, but really who cares? This is a paper that has a circulation of around 18,000 right now and has cut staff down to the bone to survive. Yes, he is the beat writer, but I really don't care about his journalistic standards because it has and always will be about the bottom line. For the record, I don't read the Daily Advertiser that much and I don't understand why you, or anyone else would if you have a problem with the integrity of the journalist on staff.