"But I will say this," he added Thursday. "It's also disappointing that so many people have vilified a few 19-year-olds making some immature decisions, and then they were the same ones that voted for someone that has done much worse by grabbing a female in the private areas for the office of the (President of the) United States of America."
He never said anything about Hillary or voting for Hillary. He also didn't say anything about Trump voters in general, only the ones who called out these kids for for doing something similar to what Trump has done in the past.
Yeah, that is what I heard, he would not have had to apologize for the spin Rebel put out.
Right you did. You said not as outrageous I misquoted you.
First of all, prayer by students is not strongly limited in public schools. There are no limits placed on student prayer unless they become disruptive. For example, a Muslim student can pray silently in school at any time. However, a Native American student can't stand up in the middle of a biology lesson and start rain dancing in the middle of class. The fact that a prayer may or may not burden an atheist has nothing to do with anything.
The type of prayer that is banned in public schools is school-sponsored prayer, and it is banned because it violates the establishment clause. There are three criteria that are used to determine whether religious criteria is constitutional or not:
- It must have a secular purpose;
- It must neither advance nor inhibit religion
- It must not result in an excessive entanglement between government and religion.
I also think it is worth noting that most of these challenges to state-sponsored school prayer came from CATHOLIC and Mormon families who didn't want the state teaching their kids a different religion from theirs. If your kid went to school in Utah, or went to school in a heavily populated jewish or muslim area, I think you would start to appreciate the establishment clause a little more.
Second, political speech is the most protected form of speech we have, and rightfully so. There are almost no limits to what you can say when you are talking about politics. And again, what few limits there are are not there because someone somewhere might get offended. You have no right to not be offended in this country. I'm not a lawyer, but even if Coach Hud wanted to discipline these kids, as a public employee, he probably still couldn't do so without opening UL up to a slam dunk civil rights lawsuit.
Third, I do agree with you that Hud should have a discussion with them about having consideration for others. I feel like our fan base would also benefit from such a discussion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)